★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
m Protected "JB/091/091/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
||
(No difference)
|
10 Feby 1807
Will not this my Lord, absolve me from the sin of
theory, speculation, Utopianism, or by whatever other name
that sin be called which stands at the head of the list under
the religion of Misrule – the sin which in the field of law
a man is guilty of whose exertions aim with all their power
and all their might at the ends of justice
whose fewer written nor powers when combating
under the banner of justice
Will not the plea absolve one that in contending for
natural procedure in the first instance, I defer only in point
of time relative time with those volumes and arbiters of who
What they Natural Procedure being their suffrage as well as :
the difference and the only difference lies in this: that with by them it is added to a fruitless
suit, a vain and costly demonstration pageant of procedure – with
me it would be substituted.
Yes, there is another difference. With Under those Natural Procedures acts
in a usual an unarmed and state, with difficulty, and by curiosity,
power now and then to apply to the evidence that security for truth
which under procedure comes of course. No power to
compel attendance of on the part of witnesses. In Scotch
procedure such (such on this ground is its weakness or improbity:)
a man by offering to another his testimony may deprive him of the
– while Natural Procedure in the helpless state in which she is
by the of his lordly rival is left without the aid of but
those who if they are not spontaneous, can not at any
rate be otherwise than willing witnesses.
Identifier: | JB/091/091/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1807-02-10 |
|||
091 |
scotch reform |
||
091 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
|||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
|||
29087 |
|||