JB/034/185/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/185/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1823. Oct.<hi rend="superscript"><hi rend="underline">r.</hi></hi> 18</p>
<head>Constitutional Code. 1. Enactive Part.</head>
<note>Ch. <!-- In pencil -->Quasi Jury<lb/>
S.</note><lb/>
<p><!-- In pencil -->(6)</p>




<p>On the part of no Judge <add>nor of many other functionary</add> can any such atrocity have<lb/>
place under a system of penal and civil law in <gap/> with<lb/>
the laws proposed Constitutional Code. But under every system<lb/>
under every check that can be applied the conduct of <add>every</add> the Judge<lb/>
will have a tendency towards carelessness and indolence:<lb/>
<del>sense</del> in general law object will be to get through his business<lb/>
with as much dispatch as he can: sometimes <add><del>one such</del></add> as doing so <del>on</del> be in<lb/>
man it will be matter of indifference whether <gap/> desires be right<lb/>
or wrong: neither <gap/> to whom there is not altogether  a matter<lb/>
of indifference will be satisfied with its being right in his own<lb/>
uses, <del>with th<gap/> without</del> <gap/> force the trouble <add><del>is end</del></add> of reading it<lb/>
<add>or at least endeavouring to render it</add> so in other eyes Opposing a barrow to <del>the indulg</del> self-indulgence<lb/>
in this shape is one of the uses <add>and benefits</add> of the Jury system, and<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>use which</add> with all possible situated <del>has been</del> it <del><gap/></del> is endeavoured<lb/>
in the Quasi Jury system uses its endeavours to unex<gap/>dle.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 19:48, 20 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. Oct.<hi rend="underline">r.</hi> 18

Constitutional Code. 1. Enactive Part. Ch. Quasi Jury
S.

(6)


On the part of no Judge nor of many other functionary can any such atrocity have
place under a system of penal and civil law in with
the laws proposed Constitutional Code. But under every system
under every check that can be applied the conduct of every the Judge
will have a tendency towards carelessness and indolence:
sense in general law object will be to get through his business
with as much dispatch as he can: sometimes one such as doing so on be in
man it will be matter of indifference whether desires be right
or wrong: neither to whom there is not altogether a matter
of indifference will be satisfied with its being right in his own
uses, with th without force the trouble is end of reading it
or at least endeavouring to render it so in other eyes Opposing a barrow to the indulg self-indulgence
in this shape is one of the uses and benefits of the Jury system, and
use which with all possible situated has been it is endeavoured
in the Quasi Jury system uses its endeavours to unexdle.



Identifier: | JB/034/185/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-10-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

185

Info in main headings field

constitutional code enactive part

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10459

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in