JB/081/137/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:35, 28 July 2023

1829 May 10
Petition

Dispatch Court
(5

Decided on and commonly at the first and sole interview the first interview one thing reasonably be expected to
be the questions following.

1. All questions touching the interpretation proper to be put upon a
last will in consideration on the ground of intention ascribed to the testator

2. All questions touching the interpretation proper to be put upon
a deed of conveyance

3. All questions touching the interpretation proper to be put
a deed of contract or say a set of promises unilateral or plurilateral
intended to be or at the time regarded as being obligatory.

Identifier: \| JB/081/137/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-05-10	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	081	Main Headings	dispatch court bill
Folio number	137	Info in main headings field	petitions
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e5
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	b&m 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public		ID Number	25924
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>1829 May 10<lb/>Petition</head> <p><note>Dispatch Court</note><lb/>(5 </p> <p>Decided <del>on</del> <add><del>and <gap/> <gap/> commonly at the first and sole interview</add> the <del>first interview</del> <add>one</add> <gap/> reasonably be expected to<lb/>be the question following.</p> <p>1.  All question <gap/> the interpretation <add>proper</add> to be put upon a<lb/>last will <add>on the ground</add> <del>in consideration</del> of intention ascribed to the testator</p> <p>2. All question touching the interpretation proper to be put upon<lb/>a deed of conveyance</p> <p>3. all question touching the interpretation proper to be put<lb/>a deed of contract or say a set of promises unilateral or <gap/><lb/>intended to be or at the time regarded as being obligatory.</p>
+<head>1829 May 10<lb/>Petition</head> <p><note>Dispatch Court</note><lb/>(5 </p> <p>Decided <del>on</del> <add><del>and <gap/> <gap/></del> commonly at the first and sole interview</add> the <del>first interview</del> <add>one</add> <unclear>thing</unclear> reasonably be expected to<lb/>be the questions following.</p> <p>1.  All questions touching the interpretation <add>proper</add> to be put upon a<lb/>last will <del>in consideration</del> <add>on the ground</add> of intention ascribed to the testator</p> <p>2. All questions touching the interpretation proper to be put upon<lb/>a deed of conveyance</p> <p>3. All questions touching the interpretation proper to be put<lb/>a deed of contract or say a set of promises unilateral or plurilateral<lb/>intended to be or at the time regarded as being obligatory.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/081/137/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:35, 28 July 2023

Navigation

Search