JB/081/240/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/240/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 May 25<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(3 <note>&sect;. 11 Elucidations<lb/>&sect;. Reconciliation Commissioners</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Beneficial effects<lb/>1. Minimization of<lb/><sic>expence</sic> &amp; delay<lb/>2. Obtainment of law<lb/>opinions from a more<lb/>trustworthy source</note></p> <!-- all text lightly crossed through in pencil --> <p>Now then as to the beneficial effects in the county in question<lb/>relative <add>with reference to</add> being had to parties, who <del><gap/></del> might otherwise have been<lb/>suitors but by this means are prevented from becoming so.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p>Here<lb/>it will secure <gap/> <gap/> debut before in set <add><gap/></add> of <gap/> the Judge so<lb/>called <gap/>: but at the same time <gap/> is <gap/> before another<lb/>set <add>class</add> of men the commissioners &#x2014; produced even when attendance by the<lb/>proposed Defendant is not paid, as above.  When then <add>In what shape</add> it may<lb/>naturally be asked is the benefit produced?  <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi> In this shape.<lb/>The small for abovementioned example, this <gap/>, the sort of pretence<lb/>may such carried on before the Commission is carried on, and when<lb/><gap/> it comes to be carried on before the Judicatory, it<lb/>is carried on at <sic>expence</sic> more or less considerable to both.</p>  <p>I. Benefit the first. <add>To the extent of the field of competence in his the legal field of <gap/></add> Substitution of <add>the issue of</add> trial and judgment<lb/>with next to no <add>the minimum of</add> <sic>expence</sic> to <gap?> at a boundless <sic>expencse, and<lb?><del.clear of all <gap/></del> as also at the minimum of delay: the<lb/>actual delay being clear of all factitious delay produced<lb>?for the sake of the profit put of the <sic>expence</sic></p> <p>II. Benefit the second. <del>Obtainment of gratuities of Law</del> <add>To that same <gap/>, from a more trustworthy source and <gap/><lb/>obtainment of<lb/>the sort of</add><lb/><del>Opinion: more</del> <add>Law Opinion customarily sought with a view to eventual commencement or defence of suit<lb/><del>and this</del> more trustworthy than any that<lb/>of openness<lb/>can be delivered by professional Lawyers</add></p> <p>Explanation <del>or request &#x2014; here then</del> <add>needful explanation</add> follows.</p>
<head>1829 May 25<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(3 <note>&sect;. 11 Elucidations<lb/>&sect;. Reconciliation Commissioners</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Beneficial effects<lb/>1. Minimization of<lb/><sic>expence</sic> &amp; delay<lb/>2. Obtainment of law<lb/>opinions from a more<lb/>trustworthy source</note></p> <!-- all text lightly crossed through in pencil --> <p>Now then as to the beneficial effects in the county in question<lb/>relation <add>with reference to</add> being had to parties, who <del><gap/></del> might otherwise have been<lb/>suitors but by this means are prevented from becoming so.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p>Here<lb/>it will secure <gap/> or debut before an set <add>class</add> of men the Judges so<lb/>called <gap/>: but at the same time <gap/> is defects before another<lb/>set <add>class</add> of men the Commissioners &#x2014; produced even when attendance by the<lb/>proposed Defendant is not found, as above.  Where then <add>In what shape</add> it may<lb/>naturally be asked is the benefit produced?  <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi> In this shape.<lb/>The small for abovementioned excepted, this debate, the sort of pretence<lb/>may such carried on before the Commission is carried on, without <sic>expence</sic><lb/><del><gap/></del> to either party: whereas were it carried on, and when<lb/><unclear>eventually</unclear> it comes to be carried on before the Judicatory, it<lb/>is carried on at <sic>expence</sic> more or less considerable to both.</p>  <p>I. Benefit the first. <add>To the extent of the field of competence in his the legal field of <del><gap/></del></add> Substitution of <add>the effect of</add> trial and judgment<lb/>with next to no <add>the minimum of</add> <sic>expence</sic> to <gap/> at a boundless <sic>expence,</sic> and<lb/><del>clear of all factitious</del> as also at the minimum of delay: the<lb/>actual delay being clear of all factitious delay produced<lb/>for the sake of the profit out of the <sic>expence</sic></p> <p>II. Benefit the second. <del>Obtainment of gratuities of Law</del> <add>To that same <unclear>extreme</unclear>. From a more trustworthy source and <sic>graticitously</sic><lb/>obtainment of<lb/>the sort of</add><lb/><del>Opinion: more <add>of <gap/></add> and this</del> <add>Law Opinion customarily sought with a view to eventual commencement or defence of suits.<lb/><del>and this</del></add> more trustworthy than any that<lb/>of Opening<lb/>can be delivered by professional Lawyers</add></p> <p>Explanations are <del>required &#x2014; Here then</del> <add>needful: explanation</add> follows.</p>





Revision as of 10:27, 15 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 25
Petitions

ult
Supplement

(3 §. 11 Elucidations
§. Reconciliation Commissioners

6
Beneficial effects
1. Minimization of
expence & delay
2. Obtainment of law
opinions from a more
trustworthy source

Now then as to the beneficial effects in the county in question
relation with reference to being had to parties, who might otherwise have been
suitors but by this means are prevented from becoming so.

Here
it will secure or debut before an set class of men the Judges so
called : but at the same time is defects before another
set class of men the Commissioners — produced even when attendance by the
proposed Defendant is not found, as above. Where then In what shape it may
naturally be asked is the benefit produced? Answer In this shape.
The small for abovementioned excepted, this debate, the sort of pretence
may such carried on before the Commission is carried on, without expence
to either party: whereas were it carried on, and when
eventually it comes to be carried on before the Judicatory, it
is carried on at expence more or less considerable to both.

I. Benefit the first. To the extent of the field of competence in his the legal field of Substitution of the effect of trial and judgment
with next to no the minimum of expence to at a boundless expence, and
clear of all factitious as also at the minimum of delay: the
actual delay being clear of all factitious delay produced
for the sake of the profit out of the expence

II. Benefit the second. Obtainment of gratuities of Law To that same extreme. From a more trustworthy source and graticitously
obtainment of
the sort of

Opinion: more of and this Law Opinion customarily sought with a view to eventual commencement or defence of suits.
and this
more trustworthy than any that
of Opening
can be delivered by professional Lawyers</add>

Explanations are required — Here then needful: explanation follows.




Identifier: | JB/081/240/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

6

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

240

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

26027

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in