JB/096/194/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/194/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/194/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>ADULTERY</head>


<p>If by this be meant, that the <add><gap/> of relative compensation</add> <note>For this purpose we must make a distinction between an absolute and a relative compensation</note> happiness restored to the aggrieved ought not to be more <add>in the one case</add> than in <add>the</add><lb/>
other, <add>[all circumstances except that of a person being equal]</add> my sentiments are the same &#x2014; If it be meant, that the absolute compensation,<lb/>
the numerical Sum ought to be no more, it is my unhappiness to think otherwise.<lb/>
My reason is that one ought to have an equivalent for his damage, as well as the 
<unclear>other</unclear><lb/>
and the Sum that is an equivalent to the one is not to the other &#x2014; I think it will <add>be</add><lb/>
allowed by those who take their notions of human characters</p> 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:32, 30 November 2011

Click Here To Edit

ADULTERY

If by this be meant, that the of relative compensation For this purpose we must make a distinction between an absolute and a relative compensation happiness restored to the aggrieved ought not to be more in the one case than in the
other, [all circumstances except that of a person being equal] my sentiments are the same — If it be meant, that the absolute compensation,
the numerical Sum ought to be no more, it is my unhappiness to think otherwise.
My reason is that one ought to have an equivalent for his damage, as well as the other
and the Sum that is an equivalent to the one is not to the other — I think it will be
allowed by those who take their notions of human characters



Identifier: | JB/096/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

194

Info in main headings field

adultery

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31198

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in