JB/549/320/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/549/320/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/549/320/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/320/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/320/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1832 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Pannomion</head></p>
 
<p>As to the Statutes which at the time of its <del><gap/></del> receiving<lb/>
 
the sanction of the legislature remains in force, which they will<lb/>
 
do, so long as they remain unrepealed at  <del>and</del> or before<lb/>
the sanction has been <del>repealed</del> given to it, the exposition<lb/>
here given to the correspondent <del><gap/></del> locution in this Pannomion<lb/>
will not be applicable to them.  But <del>to all such</del> for the<lb/>
interpretation of all such locutions <add>it is by</add> <hi rend="underline">reason</hi> <del>will</del> that is to<lb/>
say by consideration of the <unclear>cast</unclear> <del>in view</del> what appears to have<lb/>
been in view in each instance that the interpretation<lb/>
put upon the same locutions will be determined:  and<lb/>
thereby that misinterpretation avoided which by the hands<lb/>
of the Judges of <add>past and</add> existing Judicatories stiled Courts of Common<lb/>
Law <del>have bee</del> <add>has</add> been wont to have place.</p>
<p>Of such misinterpretation in example is the following<lb/>
cases.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:25, 8 September 2023

Click Here To Edit

1832 Jany
Pannomion

As to the Statutes which at the time of its receiving
the sanction of the legislature remains in force, which they will
do, so long as they remain unrepealed at and or before
the sanction has been repealed given to it, the exposition
here given to the correspondent locution in this Pannomion
will not be applicable to them. But to all such for the
interpretation of all such locutions it is by reason will that is to
say by consideration of the cast in view what appears to have
been in view in each instance that the interpretation
put upon the same locutions will be determined: and
thereby that misinterpretation avoided which by the hands
of the Judges of past and existing Judicatories stiled Courts of Common
Law have bee has been wont to have place.

Of such misinterpretation in example is the following
cases.


Identifier: | JB/549/320/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549.

Date_1

1832-01-??

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

549

Main Headings

Folio number

320

Info in main headings field

Pannomion

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in