JB/031/020/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/031/020/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/031/020/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/031/020/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1828 Aug. 7<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Blackstone</head></p>
 
<p>Altogether <unclear>unnatural</unclear> in <unclear>thinking</unclear> are the <unclear>distinctions</unclear><lb/>
<unclear>between</unclear> the <unclear>several</unclear> case designated respectively by the appellation<lb/>
of possession – <del><add>ac</add> right</del> apparent right of possession, actual right of<lb/>
possession and right of property:  but of the state of thought<lb/>
in the widely <gap/> time called  feudal <gap/>, sprang the<lb/>
pretences for making these distinctions.</p>
<p><unclear>Severe</unclear> would be the labour of endeavouring to comprehend<lb/>
them:  precarious the success of the attempt.</p>
<p>Have you <add>I</add> a right, or have you <add>I</add> not? that is <hi rend="underline">a</hi> proper<lb/>
question:  that <hi rend="underline">the</hi> only one.</p>
<p>Without or against the <gap/> of a <gap/> person or<lb/>
persons respectively, may you derive for the thing in question the<lb/>
benefit in question – without <gap/> recourse to a suit at law?<lb/>
this is the question <del>which</del> the same question which <add>in relation</add> on every occasion<lb/>
it is your interest to be satisfied.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 04:53, 15 September 2023

Click Here To Edit

1828 Aug. 7
Blackstone

Altogether unnatural in thinking are the distinctions
between the several case designated respectively by the appellation
of possession – ac right apparent right of possession, actual right of
possession and right of property: but of the state of thought
in the widely time called feudal , sprang the
pretences for making these distinctions.

Severe would be the labour of endeavouring to comprehend
them: precarious the success of the attempt.

Have you I a right, or have you I not? that is a proper
question: that the only one.

Without or against the of a person or
persons respectively, may you derive for the thing in question the
benefit in question – without recourse to a suit at law?
this is the question which the same question which in relation on every occasion
it is your interest to be satisfied.



Identifier: | JB/031/020/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.

Date_1

1828-08-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

031

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

020

Info in main headings field

blackstone

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

richard doane

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

9706

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in