JB/081/296/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:58, 29 September 2023

1829 June 3
Petitions

12
Supplement
II. Elucidation

16
relation of proposed system
to the Danish institution

Now for the relation borne by the here proposed system
to this Danish institution.

1 By proposed system
personal attendance employed,
with additional
advantages

1. By the proposed system the characteristic arrangement of the Danish
institution in course of p that is to say commencement given to the enquiry
by personal rules intercourse between the parties and the Judge is employed
but under circumstance with concomitant of advantage which under the Danish
institution have not place

17
2 Under proposed system
time and labor of obtaining
an opinion other than that
of the Judge — saved.

2. Under the here proposed system the time and labor
employed in the Danish institution for the in the obtaining of an
opinion over and above and preparatory antecedently to that of the Judge
is struck off as needless and useless: the opinion of the Judge
himself, being that in which the issue of the contest will depend
being obtained with less trouble than the opinion that as to
say the conjecture delivered by at it, and as to what
the opinion of the Judge is likely to be. fit per
quod potest per pancurse. Wasted is the time and
expended in effecting by a a larger quality of which
would be better effected by a smaller.

Identifier: \| JB/081/296/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-06-03	Marginal Summary Numbering	16-17
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	296	Info in main headings field	petitions
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f12
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	1828
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1828
Notes public		ID Number	26083
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/081/296/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p><head>1829 June 3<lb/>
+<head>1829 June 3<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>12<lb/>Supplement<lb/>II. Elucidation</note></p> <p><note>16<lb/>relation of proposed system<lb/>to <add>the</add> Danish institution</note></p> <p>Now for the relation borne by the here proposed system<lb/>to this Danish institution.</p> <p><note>1 By proposed system<lb/>personal attendance employed,<lb/>with additional<lb/>advantages</note></p> <p>1.  By the proposed system the <add>characteristic</add> arrangement of the Danish<lb/>institution <del>in <gap/> course of p</del> <add>that is to say</add> commencement given to the enquiry<lb/>by personal rules intercourse between the parties and the Judge is employed<lb/>but under circumstance <add>with concomitant</add> of advantage which under the Danish<lb/>institution have not place</p> <p><note>17<lb/>2 Under proposed system<lb/>time and <sic>labor</sic> of obtaining<lb/>an opinion other than that<lb/>of the Judge &#x2014; saved.</note></p> <p>2.  Under the here proposed system the time and <sic>labor</sic><lb/>employed in the Danish institution <del>for the</del> in the obtaining of an<lb/>opinion over and above and <del>preparatory</del> <add><sic>antecedently</sic></add> to that of the Judge<lb/>is struck off as needless and useless:  the opinion of the Judge<lb/>himself, being that in which the issue of the contest will depend<lb/>being obtained with less trouble than the opinion that <del><gap/></del> as to<lb/>say the conjecture delivered by <gap/> at it, and as to what<lb/>the opinion of the Judge is likely to be.  <foreign><gap/> fit per <gap/><lb/>quod potest per pancurse.</foreign>  Wasted is the time and <gap/><lb/>
-Petition</head><lb/>
+expended in effecting by <del><gap/> a</del> a larger quality of <gap/> which<lb/>would be better effected by a smaller.</p>
-<note>Supplement<lb/>
-&sect; Elucidation</note></p>
-<p>Now for the relation borne by the here proposed system<lb/>
-to this Danish institution.</p>
-<p>1.  By the proposed system the arrangement <add>characteristic</add> of the Danish<lb/>
-institution <del>so becomes of pa</del> <add>that is to say</add> commencement given to the enquiry<lb/>
-by personal rules even before the <gap/> and the Judge is employed<lb/>
-but under circumstance of <add>with concomitant</add> advantage which under the Danish<lb/>
-institution been not <gap/></p>
-<p>2.  Under the here proposed system the time and labour<lb/>
-employed in the Danish institution <del>for the</del> in the obtaining of an<lb/>
-<unclear>opinion</unclear> over and above and <del>preparatory</del> <add>antecedently</add> to that of the Judge<lb/>
-is struck off as needless and useless:  the opinion of the Judge<lb/>
-himself, being that in which the <gap/> of the contest will depend<lb/>
-being obtained with less trouble than the <gap/> that <del><gap/></del> as to<lb/>
-say the conjecture delivered by <gap/> <unclear>sit</unclear> it can as to what<lb/>
-the opinion of the Judge is likely to be.  <gap/> fit for <gap/><lb/>
-great fear <gap/> for <gap/>.  Wasted is the time spent <unclear>before</unclear><lb/>
-expended in effecting by <del><gap/> a</del> a larger quantity of <gap/> which<lb/>
-would be better effected by a smaller.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Views

JB/081/296/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:58, 29 September 2023

Navigation

Search