JB/004/115/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/004/115/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1830. Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>. 2<lb/>
Review.</head>
 
<p>23. That for the purpose of obviating opposition at<lb/>
the hands of the existing Judges and other <unclear>official</unclear> as well as<lb/>
practising lawyer, by <gap/><gap/> quieting in this hand the<lb/>
apprehension of experiencing any diminution of their profits <add>extortion</add><lb/>
by and in proportion go which the suffering of the vast<lb/>
majority of the people by reason of the <del><gap/></del> expense, <add>delay,</add> vexation,<lb/>
sale <del><gap/></del> and denial of justice <gap/> <gap/> encrease<lb/>
trusting to the state of <del><gap/></del> ignorance and deception<lb/>
in which by the artifices of lawyers <del>the</del> persons of all<lb/>
other classes have been involved, <unclear>be he actually</unclear> in and<lb/>
by such his Bill pretended to believe that <del>the <gap/><lb/>
<gap/></del> where the right to a <gap/> of <gap/> is the matter<lb/>
in dispute the course <add>most</add> proper to be pursued for the purpose<lb/>
of establishing <add>much of</add> the fact which <del><gap/></del> such right has for its ground<lb/>
is different according to the <hi rend="underline">quantity</hi> of <gap/> of<lb/>
the same <add>so</add> demanded or the ground of the demand in the<lb/>
ground of law in so much that if the same <unclear>annals</unclear><lb/>
not to more than £5 the enquiry <del><gap/></del> ought to be made<lb/>
in such a mode, if as much as £50 but no more<lb/>
such another mode, if as much as £100: <del>and no more<lb/>
that of the Judge <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>
<gap/><gap/> Judge of the Arbitration Court<lb/>
an opinion which</del> a notion which only in <add>its</add> degree and<lb/>
not in its nature is less absurd than <del>if it were <gap/></del> <add>than would be the notion <hi rend="superscript">(c)</hi></add><lb/>
<del>than namely that for obtaining <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>
probability of <gap/><gap/> there ought to be <gap/><lb/>
every <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> and so<lb/>
in there ought to be so many <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>
the option of which ought to be <gap/><gap/><gap/></del><lb/>
<note><hi rend="superscript">(c)</hi> whatsoever be the number of<lb/>
the <del>so many</del> different <gap/><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> capable of<lb/>
being demanded, <del><gap/></del><lb/>
that same ought to be the<lb/>
<gap/> of the different<lb/>
modes of enquiry pursued<lb/>
by the Judge<lb/>
<del><gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>
<gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>
difference <gap/><gap/><lb/>
number of different<lb/>
modes of enquiry ought<lb/>
to be provided <gap/></del></note></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:16, 2 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1830. Augt. 2
Review.

23. That for the purpose of obviating opposition at
the hands of the existing Judges and other official as well as
practising lawyer, by quieting in this hand the
apprehension of experiencing any diminution of their profits extortion
by and in proportion go which the suffering of the vast
majority of the people by reason of the expense, delay, vexation,
sale and denial of justice encrease
trusting to the state of ignorance and deception
in which by the artifices of lawyers the persons of all
other classes have been involved, be he actually in and
by such his Bill pretended to believe that the
where the right to a of is the matter
in dispute the course most proper to be pursued for the purpose
of establishing much of the fact which such right has for its ground
is different according to the quantity of of
the same so demanded or the ground of the demand in the
ground of law in so much that if the same annals
not to more than £5 the enquiry ought to be made
in such a mode, if as much as £50 but no more
such another mode, if as much as £100: and no more
that of the Judge
Judge of the Arbitration Court
an opinion which
a notion which only in its degree and
not in its nature is less absurd than if it were than would be the notion (c)
than namely that for obtaining
probability of there ought to be
every and so
in there ought to be so many
the option of which ought to be

(c) whatsoever be the number of
the so many different
capable of
being demanded,
that same ought to be the
of the different
modes of enquiry pursued
by the Judge


difference
number of different
modes of enquiry ought
to be provided




Identifier: | JB/004/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-08-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

23

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

115

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1829

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

2036

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in