JB/004/116/001

Click Here To Edit

1830. Augt. 2 Review.

24 That in like manner the matter of fact which is the subject matter of inquiry being the saving in the several cases the same, if he makes the mode of carrying on the inquiry different, according to the manner and character in which the same individual Judge is made to act: if he be called a Judge in ordinary it is one mode, if he be called a Judge of the Small Debt Court it is another mode, if he be called a Judge of the Legacy Court, it is again another mode if he be called a Judge of the Arbitration Court it is again another mode, if he be called a Judge of the Reconcilement Court it is again another mode.

25 That being fully apprised that in a writ stiled well known Petition for Justice by the that by the Judges of old have of the existing system of regular procedure for the purpose of swelling to the greatest possible extent their own maleficent profits various devious different to the number of no less than the with but too much success been employed, as shewn in a work intituled Petitions for Justice &c. and well knowing that by every one of devious contributions was made to the aggregate grievance consisting of the factitious expense, delay, sale and denial of justice, he the said Henry Brougham has in this his Bill given throughout employment to the several

Identifier: | JB/004/116/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.
Date_1	1830-08-02	Marginal Summary Numbering	24-25
Box	004	Main Headings	lord brougham displayed
Folio number	116	Info in main headings field	review
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e11
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	2037
Box Contents