JB/096/203/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/203/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/203/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/203/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>HOMICIDE <foreign>per infortunium</foreign> - reparation <hi rend='superscript'>3</hi> a particular species.</head>


<p>Composition should be prohibited ender the ordinary penalties; since the sole object<lb/>
<add>and utility</add> of the regulation proposed is the example &#x2014; the Execution of the verdict<lb/>
upon the drover to be performed in Smithfield for the same reason &#x2014; No<lb/>
<foreign>Capias ad satisfaciendum</foreign> however to be permitted to be said out against the Master &#x2014;<lb/>
the efficacy of the example is <add>already</add> attained <add>in good measure</add> by the Verdict: and the execution<lb/>
is permitted only that it may not be regarded as nugatory: but <add>for</add> that purpose<lb/>
it is not <add>cannot</add> necessary that <add>in any case</add> the penalty should be strained beyond the limits of his<lb/>
substance &#x2014; the insufficiency of his moveables to <del><gap/></del> <add>satisfy</add> the <del>damages</del> <add>and set</add> would<lb/>
indicate in <add>their</add> undue exorbitance in the Damages.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 21:04, 1 December 2011

Click Here To Edit

HOMICIDE per infortunium - reparation 3 a particular species.

Composition should be prohibited ender the ordinary penalties; since the sole object
and utility of the regulation proposed is the example — the Execution of the verdict
upon the drover to be performed in Smithfield for the same reason — No
Capias ad satisfaciendum however to be permitted to be said out against the Master —
the efficacy of the example is already attained in good measure by the Verdict: and the execution
is permitted only that it may not be regarded as nugatory: but for that purpose
it is not cannot necessary that in any case the penalty should be strained beyond the limits of his
substance — the insufficiency of his moveables to satisfy the damages and set would
indicate in their undue exorbitance in the Damages.



Identifier: | JB/096/203/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

203

Info in main headings field

homicide per infortunium by oxen

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31207

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in