JB/034/130/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/130/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
<p>&sect; No inconsistency in thus harnessing the power of a Jury</p>
<p>&sect; No inconsistency in thus harnessing the power of a Jury</p>


But says somebody you in whose eyes their same<lb/>
<p>But says somebody you in whose eyes their same<lb/>
individuals are not unapt to bear a paramount part in<lb/>
individuals are not unapt to bear a paramount part in<lb/>
the business of legislation
the business of legislation<add>of legislation can even <gap/> unbounded scale</add>, can you with any con<gap/>tiary, regard<lb/>
 
those as unapt with regard to a function so <del><gap/></del> <gap/><lb/>
 
in its extent so subordinate in its importance in that of <lb/>
 
pronouncing a g<gap/> or  <gap/> in case whether <add>in the defendants side of the cause</add> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
 
is at state than the fate of this or that individual?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>Answer</p>
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
<p>I answer<add>Answer</add> 1. in regard to the <del><gap/></del> power I give<lb/>
to them - ot os under the pressure of necessity that I give it to<lb/>
them because in no other land could it be riposed, without in<add>the</add><lb/>
absolute certainty of its being abused.</p>
<p>2.. In the case of the power given to them as to the <gap/><lb/>
of legislators, for <del><gap/></del> in no certain whatever is any time of the legislation<lb/>
given to them, I have them <del><gap/></del> as according to all expression<lb/>
I may without danger have them, to be assisted, and in as far as<lb/>
this phase guided by general reputation: no opinion in<lb/>
judgment of their <gap/> are they in their<add>that</add> cause called upon to<lb/>
pronounce.  But <add>of judicature by no one of <gap/> can here be pronounced</add> in other case no judgement can any one of the <unclear>proname</unclear> <lb/>
<add>any judgment</add> which is not his own: <add>no less direct</add> as del<gap/>ted and coupled is<lb/>
the cognizance taken of the matter this case <add>their situation</add> than in the <add>his situation</add> case<lb/>
is that of the Judge. In the forming of it no impartial assistance<lb/>
have they: no assistance that so much as pro<gap/> to be impartial,<lb/>
other than that of the Judge: of that very functionary,<lb/>
to whose power the <del><gap/></del> and sole use of theirs as to apply<lb/>
a check: and under <add>to</add> whose <add>direction</add> guidance in so far as without<lb/>
forming a relation to the number are opinion of their own, they<lb/>
co<gap/> themselves, their function is of <add>in efficient and useless</add> no use</p>{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:16, 6 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1828. August 25

Constitutional Code.

§ No inconsistency in thus harnessing the power of a Jury

But says somebody you in whose eyes their same
individuals are not unapt to bear a paramount part in
the business of legislationof legislation can even unbounded scale, can you with any contiary, regard
those as unapt with regard to a function so
in its extent so subordinate in its importance in that of
pronouncing a g or in case whether in the defendants side of the cause
is at state than the fate of this or that individual?

Answer

I answerAnswer 1. in regard to the power I give
to them - ot os under the pressure of necessity that I give it to
them because in no other land could it be riposed, without inthe
absolute certainty of its being abused.

2.. In the case of the power given to them as to the
of legislators, for in no certain whatever is any time of the legislation
given to them, I have them as according to all expression
I may without danger have them, to be assisted, and in as far as
this phase guided by general reputation: no opinion in
judgment of their are they in theirthat cause called upon to
pronounce. But of judicature by no one of can here be pronounced in other case no judgement can any one of the proname
any judgment which is not his own: no less direct as delted and coupled is
the cognizance taken of the matter this case their situation than in the his situation case
is that of the Judge. In the forming of it no impartial assistance
have they: no assistance that so much as pro to be impartial,
other than that of the Judge: of that very functionary,
to whose power the and sole use of theirs as to apply
a check: and under to whose direction guidance in so far as without
forming a relation to the number are opinion of their own, they
co themselves, their function is of in efficient and useless no use

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in