JB/051/233/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/233/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


In England in the jurisdiction of Justices of<lb/>the peace where <del>sum</del> summary justice is allowed<lb/>it is given with less reluctance to two Justices<lb/> than to one.  
In England in the jurisdiction of Justices of<lb/>the peace where <del>sum</del> summary justice is allowed<lb/>it is given with less reluctance to two Justices<lb/> than to one. [<del>where anxiety for the efficacy of</del><lb/><del>the laws predominates the business <unclear>is</unclear> <gap/> they</del><lb/> <del><unclear>trust</unclear> the business with one: where anxiety for</del><lb/> <del>the security of the individual predominates, they</del><lb/> <del><gap/> <gap/> to it.] This</del> <add>The preference</add> is <del>very</del> altogether reasonable:<lb/>and nothing less than inconsistent with the preference<lb/> I give to one. A single <del>Justice has no</del> <add>Judge of this kind</add><lb/> <del>trouble about <gap/></del> judges in the dark: he sits<lb/> <add><del>to <unclear>find</unclear></del></add> in his closet: he may sit, <add>if he pleases,</add> in his coal-hob.<lb/> <del>if he pleases.</del> He judges in a thousand instances<lb/> without appeal: and there is good<lb/> reason for that too: for the costs of appeal<lb/>would frighten prosecutors: and the law might as<lb/>well not be made.  


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 23:03, 3 December 2011

Click Here To Edit

In England in the jurisdiction of Justices of
the peace where sum summary justice is allowed
it is given with less reluctance to two Justices
than to one. [where anxiety for the efficacy of
the laws predominates the business is they
trust the business with one: where anxiety for
the security of the individual predominates, they
to it.] This The preference is very altogether reasonable:
and nothing less than inconsistent with the preference
I give to one. A single Justice has no Judge of this kind
trouble about judges in the dark: he sits
to find in his closet: he may sit, if he pleases, in his coal-hob.
if he pleases. He judges in a thousand instances
without appeal: and there is good
reason for that too: for the costs of appeal
would frighten prosecutors: and the law might as
well not be made.



Identifier: | JB/051/233/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

233

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16398

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in