★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
"that we know."</p> | "that we know."</p> | ||
<p>The reader will now judge whether I had not some foundation<lb/> | |||
for my hypothesis <add>opinion above <gap/></add> that the number of <del>children</del> <add>infants</add><lb/> | |||
destroyed would not be increased by the withdrawing the<lb/> | |||
punishment from the <sic>practise</sic> — an hypothesis that<lb/> | |||
seems confirmed by a notorious and continued experience <add>continued and conspicuous course of</add><lb/> | |||
<add>experience of much too great a notoriety to be questioned.</add></p> | |||
<p>I hope I shall not be misunderstood as recommending the<lb/> | |||
express permission <add>countenancing</add> and encouragement of such a <sic>practise</sic><lb/> | |||
by a Law which running directly counter to the <del>senti-</del><lb/> | |||
current of popular sentiment would in that view <add>from that consideration</add> <del>be</del> even<lb/> | |||
if <add><sic>tho'</sic></add> some slight advantage were too result for it, be impolitic<lb/> | |||
and impracticable — There is a great <add>wide total</add> difference between<lb/> | |||
approving a <sic>practise</sic> by a new Law, and repealing an</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
---page break---
1
effect the direct opposite of that designed. Perhaps
(sagacious philosopher) "by an odd connection of
or causes, this barbarous custom might contribute to render
"those times more populous. By removing the terrors of
"too numerous a family it would engage many people
"in marriage; and such is the force of natural affections
"that very few in comparison would have resolution
"enough when it came to the point, to carry into
"execution their former intentions. China where this
"practise still prevails, is the most populous country
"that we know."
The reader will now judge whether I had not some foundation
for my hypothesis opinion above that the number of children infants
destroyed would not be increased by the withdrawing the
punishment from the practise — an hypothesis that
seems confirmed by a notorious and continued experience continued and conspicuous course of
experience of much too great a notoriety to be questioned.
I hope I shall not be misunderstood as recommending the
express permission countenancing and encouragement of such a practise
by a Law which running directly counter to the senti-
current of popular sentiment would in that view from that consideration be even
if tho' some slight advantage were too result for it, be impolitic
and impracticable — There is a great wide total difference between
approving a practise by a new Law, and repealing an
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/096/219/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
legislation |
||
219 |
homicide - of infants |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
3 |
||
recto |
c19 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]] |
||
31223 |
|||