JB/051/238/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/238/004: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>Judicial</head><lb/>map of defensive <add>appearances</add> circumstances as <del>can</del> <gap/> presents<lb/>but rarely. Where the innocence is manifest<lb/>upon the face of the evidence the innocence of the defen<lb/>-dant is clear and manifest to the degree in which<lb/>innocence <add>will be</add> is manifest in ninety <add>nine</add> cases out of a<lb/>hundred <add>where it is exists</add> there is no room for prejudice to operate <lb/><lb/>to his disadvantage <add>on the mind of anyone</add> much less will there be any opening room<lb/>of <del>punishing</del> inflicting groundless punishment<lb/>for a wicked intention to accomplish its object.<lb/><lb/><add>On the other hand</add> Were the mischief as probable a it appears<lb/>it would find itself opposed by two powerful guards<lb/>to be the contrary it has two powerful guards<lb/>to combat it <del>which</del> both of which seem for the pre-<lb/>-sent to <add>have</add> escaped the attention of our legislature all. <gap/><lb/>These are the right of appeal, and the publicity<lb/> of the procedure. Let an appeal preferred, and<lb/>you have immediately that <add>division of Judication</add> diversity of <del><gap/></del> Judges<lb/><add>on the utility</add> in the <gap/> of which he lays so great a strip.<lb/>The <add>security offered by the</add> right of appeal should naturally be of itself<lb/> sufficient to the purpose. It is to be apprehended<lb/>that <del>a man</del> an innocent man <add>finding himself</add> having been wrong-<lb/>-fully convicted through the prejudice ot nature of<lb/>the Judge should acquiesce in the conviction?<lb/> And if he appeals, what is there to prevent his<lb/>having justice done him in the Court above?
<head>Judicial</head><lb/>map of defensive <add>appearances</add> circumstances as <del>can</del> <gap/> presents<lb/>but rarely. Where the innocence is manifest<lb/>upon the face of the evidence the innocence of the defen<lb/>-dant is clear and manifest to the degree in which<lb/>innocence <add>will be</add> is manifest in ninety <add>nine</add> cases out of a<lb/>hundred <add>where it is exists</add> there is no room for prejudice to operate <lb/>to his disadvantage <add>on the mind of anyone</add> much less will there be any opening room<lb/>for a wicked intention <add>of <del>punishing</del> inflicting groundless punishment</add> to accomplish its object.<lb/><lb/>On the other hand</add> Were the mischief as probable a it appears<lb/>it would find itself opposed by two powerful guards<lb/>to be the contrary it has two powerful guards<lb/>to combat it <del>which</del> both of which seem for the pre-<lb/>-sent to <add>have</add> escaped the attention of our legislature all. <gap/><lb/>These are the right of appeal, and the publicity<lb/> of the procedure. Let an appeal preferred, and<lb/>you have immediately that <add>division of Judication</add> diversity of <del><gap/></del> Judges<lb/><add>on the utility</add> in the <gap/> of which he lays so great a strip.<lb/>The <add>security offered by the</add> right of appeal should naturally be of itself<lb/> sufficient to the purpose. It is to be apprehended<lb/>that <del>a man</del> an innocent man <add>finding himself</add> having been wrong-<lb/>-fully convicted through the prejudice ot nature of<lb/>the Judge should acquiesce in the conviction?<lb/> And if he appeals, what is there to prevent his<lb/>having justice done him in the Court above?





Revision as of 18:35, 15 December 2011

Click Here To Edit

Judicial
map of defensive appearances circumstances as can presents
but rarely. Where the innocence is manifest
upon the face of the evidence the innocence of the defen
-dant is clear and manifest to the degree in which
innocence will be is manifest in ninety nine cases out of a
hundred where it is exists there is no room for prejudice to operate
to his disadvantage on the mind of anyone much less will there be any opening room
for a wicked intention of punishing inflicting groundless punishment to accomplish its object.

On the other hand</add> Were the mischief as probable a it appears
it would find itself opposed by two powerful guards
to be the contrary it has two powerful guards
to combat it which both of which seem for the pre-
-sent to have escaped the attention of our legislature all.
These are the right of appeal, and the publicity
of the procedure. Let an appeal preferred, and
you have immediately that division of Judication diversity of Judges
on the utility in the of which he lays so great a strip.
The security offered by the right of appeal should naturally be of itself
sufficient to the purpose. It is to be apprehended
that a man an innocent man finding himself having been wrong-
-fully convicted through the prejudice ot nature of
the Judge should acquiesce in the conviction?
And if he appeals, what is there to prevent his
having justice done him in the Court above?




Identifier: | JB/051/238/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

238

Info in main headings field

judicial

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / / / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16403

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in