★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/062/185/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/062/185/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<note><gap/><unclear>person</unclear><lb/><gap/>marking</note><head>Indirect</head><lb/>-tory? this the traveller has not told us. How<lb/>it should have gained <unclear>fortune</unclear> as a matter of <lb/>choice it is difficult to conceive for what motive<lb/> could have given birth to it? <del><gap/></del> what benefit a man may have from <lb/>it | |||
(and we shall see hereafter that that benefit<lb/>is not small) results not from the deference<lb/>he himself pays to it, but from the deference <lb/> paid to it by other people. <del>As the</del> Is it compulsory?<lb/><del><unclear>If it could then</del></unclear> <add>This</add>we should <add>hardly think</add><lb/><gap/>it were, considering the reversity of the laws<lb/>and the rigid uniform obedience that is paid<lb/>them; since it<add>turns out to be</add> not mentioned as <gap/><add>admitting</add><lb/><add><gap/></add> <unclear>universally</unclear> without exception: perhaps the exception<lb/> if any may have been made in favour<lb/>of particular classes of persons, by the<lb/>law itself.<note>The extraordinary reversity <lb/>of the laws of the rigid <lb/>evidence paid to them seems <lb/>to render this improbable,<lb/>as the deference paid to <lb/>this custom seems not<lb/>to <add>be clear</add><gap/></note> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
person
markingIndirect
-tory? this the traveller has not told us. How
it should have gained fortune as a matter of
choice it is difficult to conceive for what motive
could have given birth to it? what benefit a man may have from
it
(and we shall see hereafter that that benefit
is not small) results not from the deference
he himself pays to it, but from the deference
paid to it by other people. As the Is it compulsory?
<unclear>If it could then</unclear> Thiswe should hardly think
it were, considering the reversity of the laws
and the rigid uniform obedience that is paid
them; since itturns out to be not mentioned as admitting
universally without exception: perhaps the exception
if any may have been made in favour
of particular classes of persons, by the
law itself.The extraordinary reversity
of the laws of the rigid
evidence paid to them seems
to render this improbable,
as the deference paid to
this custom seems not
to be clear
|
Identifier: | JB/062/185/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 62. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
062 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
185 |
indirect |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f9 / f10 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
20175 |
|||
