JB/050/142/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/050/142/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>CERTAINTY. Pardon.</head>
<head>CERTAINTY. Pardon.</head>
Those who make clemency<unclear> a</unclear> matter of commendation<lb/>to a prince, &amp; infer a merit from the naked<lb/>fact of his punishing seldom, never consider<lb/>that they <add>must first</add> make him a Tyrant in order to <add>before they can</add> <lb/>put him in a capacity to receive their<lb/>compliment &#x2014;
<p>Those who make clemency<unclear> a</unclear> matter of commendation<lb/>to a prince, &amp; infer a merit from the naked<lb/>fact of his punishing seldom, never consider<lb/>that they <add>must first</add> make him a Tyrant in order to <add>before they can</add> <lb/>put him in a capacity to receive their<lb/>compliment &#x2014;
   
   
<note>The exercising of the prerogative of pardon <del><unclear>is</unclear></del> <add>can be</add> justifiable only in 2 cases - either 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> when it can be done so that it will not <del>without</del> <sic>heighthening</sic> <add>augmenting</add> the presumption of <unclear>impunity</unclear>; or 2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> when though it <del>is</del> <add>will</add> <del>seen that it must contribute to heighten that presumption,</del> yet the case <add>in question</add> is such that the <add>chance of</add> mischief thereby <gap/>done <add>incurred</add> is not equivalent to the actual misery which would be inflicted <add>produced</add> by the execution. It must immediately be seen, that the <del>existance <unclear>of</unclear> </del> <add>matter of fact in</add> the better case is incapable of <del><gap/> can never be <gap/></del> <add>explicit</add> verification: &amp; hence it is dangerous to admitt this case at all. - As to the former case, the instances where it <add><unclear>may</unclear></add> takes place may be comprized under general rules.</note>
<note>The exercising of the prerogative of pardon <del><unclear>is</unclear></del> <add>can be</add> justifiable only in 2 cases - either 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> when it can be done so that it will not <del>without</del> <sic>heighthening</sic> <add>augmenting</add> the presumption of <unclear>impunity</unclear>; or 2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> when though it <del>is</del> <add>will</add> <del>seen that it must contribute to heighten that presumption,</del> yet the case <add>in question</add> is such that the <add>chance of</add> mischief thereby <gap/>done <add>incurred</add> is not equivalent to the actual misery which would be inflicted <add>produced</add> by the execution. It must immediately be seen, that the <del>existance <unclear>of</unclear> </del> <add>matter of fact in</add> the better case is incapable of <del><gap/> can never be <gap/></del> <add>explicit</add> verification: &amp; hence it is dangerous to admitt this case at all. - As to the former case, the instances where it <add><unclear>may</unclear></add> takes place may be comprized under general rules.</note>


They must suppose him not<lb/>to regard the interests of society in the infliction<lb/>of his punishments, in which case, &amp; in which case only, abstract<del>edly</del>ing from the circumstances<lb/>of each particular case <add>affair</add>, it <del>is a</del> <add>can be</add> pronounced<lb/>commendable to make them cease &#x2014;
They must suppose him not<lb/>to regard the interests of society in the infliction<lb/>of his punishments, in which case, &amp; in which case only, abstract<del>edly</del>ing from the circumstances<lb/>of each particular case <add>affair</add>, it <del>is a</del> <add>can be</add> pronounced<lb/>commendable to make them cease &#x2014; <del>Whom</del> <add>Let us</add><lb/><del>they <gap/> be taken away</del> <add>but suppose in any case that <unclear>they</unclear></add> the taking of them<lb/>away can be performed <add>are not necessary for the</add> without frustrating the<lb/>purpose of <unclear>prosecution</unclear>, the exercise of it is <del>not</del> a<lb/> Duty: a Duty the merit of <add>fulfilling</add> which is just as<lb/>great but no greater <del>than</del> as that of inflicting them<lb/>where they are.</p><pb/>
 
<p><add>To</add> Pardoning simply &amp; in the abstract can be pronounced<lb/>a merit only in the dealings of individuals<lb/>with each other
<note>The matter of expediency being settled, Pardon is an act of Justice, as much as Punishment. Pardoning is a branch of Justice the exercise of which cannot be governed by any certain rules</note></p>
 
In the abstract as between the Sovereign &amp; <lb/>individual no certain rule can be established <add>collected</add> 





Revision as of 17:21, 28 December 2011



Click Here To Edit

CERTAINTY. Pardon.

Those who make clemency a matter of commendation
to a prince, & infer a merit from the naked
fact of his punishing seldom, never consider
that they must first make him a Tyrant in order to before they can
put him in a capacity to receive their
compliment — The exercising of the prerogative of pardon is can be justifiable only in 2 cases - either 1st when it can be done so that it will not without heighthening augmenting the presumption of impunity; or 2dly when though it is will seen that it must contribute to heighten that presumption, yet the case in question is such that the chance of mischief thereby done incurred is not equivalent to the actual misery which would be inflicted produced by the execution. It must immediately be seen, that the existance of matter of fact in the better case is incapable of can never be explicit verification: & hence it is dangerous to admitt this case at all. - As to the former case, the instances where it may takes place may be comprized under general rules. They must suppose him not
to regard the interests of society in the infliction
of his punishments, in which case, & in which case only, abstractedlying from the circumstances
of each particular case affair, it is a can be pronounced
commendable to make them cease — Whom Let us
they be taken away but suppose in any case that they the taking of them
away can be performed are not necessary for the without frustrating the
purpose of prosecution, the exercise of it is not a
Duty: a Duty the merit of fulfilling which is just as
great but no greater than as that of inflicting them
where they are.


---page break---

To Pardoning simply & in the abstract can be pronounced
a merit only in the dealings of individuals
with each other The matter of expediency being settled, Pardon is an act of Justice, as much as Punishment. Pardoning is a branch of Justice the exercise of which cannot be governed by any certain rules

In the abstract as between the Sovereign &
individual no certain rule can be established collected




Identifier: | JB/050/142/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

142

Info in main headings field

certainty pardon

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16133

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in