★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1830. Augt. 1 | |||
Review. | |||
After this explication, this exemplification, and we hope to | |||
say the elucidation, what we have nest to say and submitt to | |||
the consideration of our readers is that the matter of law what it | |||
says, and to the matter of fact of which a description is given is it | |||
what it says, for coming at the true answer to the question <gap/> | |||
<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> | |||
on the instant occasion in question has or has not an exemplification | |||
been given of the state of things of which a description has been given | |||
in that same passage of the law, <gap/> <gap/> and more apt <gap/> | |||
to be taken this is not in any individual case more other than one | |||
and that is the having as soon as possible from him who applies | |||
to him a p<gap/> of the law put in form what he has to say to the Judge | |||
to motion him to interfere: and if in having this what this person the | |||
applicant says, he sees reason to go on with the inquiry, then he has | |||
what if any thing the individual at whose charge the demand is made | |||
has to say in opposition to its being granted: and if he sees reason to | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1830. Augt. 1 Review.
After this explication, this exemplification, and we hope to say the elucidation, what we have nest to say and submitt to the consideration of our readers is that the matter of law what it says, and to the matter of fact of which a description is given is it what it says, for coming at the true answer to the question on the instant occasion in question has or has not an exemplification been given of the state of things of which a description has been given in that same passage of the law, and more apt to be taken this is not in any individual case more other than one and that is the having as soon as possible from him who applies to him a p of the law put in form what he has to say to the Judge to motion him to interfere: and if in having this what this person the applicant says, he sees reason to go on with the inquiry, then he has what if any thing the individual at whose charge the demand is made has to say in opposition to its being granted: and if he sees reason to
|
Identifier: | JB/004/132/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-08-01 |
|||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
132 |
review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1829 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
2053 |
|||
