JB/081/333/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/333/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1829 April 12 +<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>+ + 32<lb/>(2) (9</p> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>&sect;.2. Elucidation</note></p> <p><del>Now far from adequate this <foreign>succedaneum</foreign> is, can<lb/>not but be manifest.</del></p> <p>This this <foreign>succedaneum</foreign> wants much of being an<lb/>adequate one is but too incontestable.  In many a case it<Lb/>will amount to nothing: perhaps in most cases.  It will<lb/><del>depend <add>partly</add> in <unclear>all</unclear> the same circumstances affecting sensibility <!-- brackets in pencil --> [a<lb/>list of which, as <sic>compleat</sic> as the author could make it<lb/>may be seen in the Introduction to the <gap/> another work:</del>]<lb/><add>depend</add> partly on the <hi rend="underline">importance</hi> of the matter in question, in the<lb/>conception of the individual this when the testimony is <del>they</del> <add>afforded; <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi><lb/><note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> partly on such<lb/>of the circumstance<lb/>affecting sensibility>lb/>as happen to have<lb/>place in his instance<lb/>of which circumstances<lb/>a list at <sic>compleat</sic> as<lb/>it was in the authors<lb/>power to write it<lb/>has been before the public<lb/>for the last 40<lb/>years</note><lb/><del>supposed to be afforded</del> But, by the inability to do all that<lb/>is desirable to be done, no <gap/> <add><gap/></add> is afforded for omitting to do<lb/><add>any thing of</add> that which, without preponderant inconvenience is capable<lb/>of being done.</p> <p><del>The <unclear>minutating</unclear></del> <add>Report thus made</add> of the <hi rend="underline">natural signs</hi> <del>with which in<lb/>the individual vicarious the conventional signs happen to be <gap/></del><lb/>as already (as every body knows) in <add>common</add> use: witness<lb/>the <del>accounts of the</del> <hi rend="underline">Hear hear</hi>! hear hear! and in a<lb/>word, <add>of</add> the marks of agitation, mention of which is <add>so continually</add> made in the<lb/>periodicals of the day, when giving an account of what <del>passe</del><lb/>has passed at a meeting more or less public.</p> <p>Thus much as to what <add>for the removal of imperfection</add> can <hi rend="underline">not</hi> be done.  Now as<lb/>to what <hi rend="underline">can</hi> <add>and might</add> be done.  It consists in <del>the committing to writing</del> <add>maximizing the use made<lb/>of the permanent signs as in committing to writing</add> in so far as <del>can be done</del> without preponderant inconvenience<lb/><del>whatever evidence</del> <add>can be done, whatsoever portion of <del>discor</del> the matter of discourse</add> from the commencement of its suit or<lb/>other application, in the termination of it, has been elicited<lb/>in the <hi rend="underline">oral</hi> mode.  Thus does <add>be</add> the removal <del>may be to any</del> <add>in question<lb/>ever so</add> degree moreover, no <del>other</del> <add>greater or</add> diminution of <gap/>, <del><gap/></del> <add>nor</add><lb/>consequently <add>any greater</add> danger of deception and misdecision will have place<lb/>than that which has thus been described.  Judge <add>A</add> <del.<gap/></del> (Suppose<lb/>has been removed: <add>Judge A in whose presence the testimony has in the oral mode been elicited: and<lb/>with it the natural signs<lb/>with which the utterance<lb/>of it was accompanied</add> <del>his place has been taken by Judge B.  In which way<lb/>his situattion is that of disadvantage: as compared with that of Judge A <add><gap/> above stated</add> A has <del><gap/></del><lb/>But how great soever the disadvantage may be in the case of this <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> Judge it will [+] <lb/><note>[+] not be greater in the<lb/>case of a <hi rend="underline">third</hi> Judge:<lb/>nor in a word in the case<lb/>of the last of any number<lb>of successive Judges.</note></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 16:13, 5 November 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 April 12 +
Petitions

+ + 32
(2) (9

Supplement
§.2. Elucidation

Now far from adequate this succedaneum is, can
not but be manifest.

This this succedaneum wants much of being an
adequate one is but too incontestable. In many a case it
will amount to nothing: perhaps in most cases. It will
depend partly in all the same circumstances affecting sensibility [a
list of which, as compleat as the author could make it
may be seen in the Introduction to the another work:
]
depend partly on the importance of the matter in question, in the
conception of the individual this when the testimony is they afforded; [+]
[+] partly on such
of the circumstance
affecting sensibility>lb/>as happen to have
place in his instance
of which circumstances
a list at compleat as
it was in the authors
power to write it
has been before the public
for the last 40
years

supposed to be afforded But, by the inability to do all that
is desirable to be done, no <add>
is afforded for omitting to do
any thing of that which, without preponderant inconvenience is capable
of being done.

The minutating Report thus made of the natural signs with which in
the individual vicarious the conventional signs happen to be

as already (as every body knows) in common use: witness
the accounts of the Hear hear! hear hear! and in a
word, of the marks of agitation, mention of which is so continually made in the
periodicals of the day, when giving an account of what passe
has passed at a meeting more or less public.

Thus much as to what for the removal of imperfection can not be done. Now as
to what can and might be done. It consists in the committing to writing maximizing the use made
of the permanent signs as in committing to writing
in so far as can be done without preponderant inconvenience
whatever evidence can be done, whatsoever portion of discor the matter of discourse from the commencement of its suit or
other application, in the termination of it, has been elicited
in the oral mode. Thus does be the removal may be to any in question
ever so
degree moreover, no other greater or diminution of , nor
consequently any greater danger of deception and misdecision will have place
than that which has thus been described. Judge A <del. (Suppose
has been removed: Judge A in whose presence the testimony has in the oral mode been elicited: and
with it the natural signs
with which the utterance
of it was accompanied
his place has been taken by Judge B. In which way
his situattion is that of disadvantage: as compared with that of Judge A above stated A has

But how great soever the disadvantage may be in the case of this Judge it will [+]
[+] not be greater in the
case of a third Judge:
nor in a word in the case
of the last of any number<lb>of successive Judges.




Identifier: | JB/081/333/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-04-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

333

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / d32 / e9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

26120

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in