JB/004/137/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/137/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1830 July 23
<head>1830 July 23<lb/>
Review
Review</head>


M
<note>M<lb/>
<lb/>
Chicanera<lb/>
3. Legacia</note>


Chicanera
<p>III. Enter now Chicanera Legacia</p>
3. Legacia


III. Enter now Chicanera Legacia
<p>1<lb/>
To enable <hi rend="underline">Actor</hi> to<lb/>
receive of <hi rend="underline">Reus</hi> money<lb/>
bequeathed by <hi rend="underline">Defunctus</hi><lb/>
antecedent collative<lb/>
events necessary<lb/>
1. Death of <hi rend="underline">Defunctus</hi><lb/>
2. Administration by<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Reus</hi><lb/>
3. Existence of <hi rend="underline">Defunctus</hi><lb/>
will<lb/>
4. Bequest to <hi rend="underline">Actor</hi><lb/>
5. Sufficiency of <hi rend="underline">Defunctus</hi><lb/>
property to pay<lb/>
Actor's legacy<lb/>
6. D<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> to pay all other<lb/>
legacies bequeathed by<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Defunctus</hi></p>


1
<p>To enable <hi rend="underline">Actor</hi> to receive of <hi rend="underline">Reus</hi> a sum<lb/>
To enable Actor to
of money on the ground of the having Sum bequeathed<lb/>
receive of Reus money
to him by <hi rend="underline">Defunctus</hi>, three <add>antecedent</add> concurrent states of things<lb/>
bequeathed by Defendia
or events in the character of efficient causes of right<lb/>
antecedent collative
or title are necessary: namely 1. Death of Defunctus.<lb/>
events necessary
2. Operation of some sort or other performed by Reus,<lb/>
1. Death of Defunctus
in the character of Execution or Administration <del>of</del> <add>in relation to</add> the property<lb/>
2. Administration by
of Defunctus. 3. the existence of the sort of<lb/>
Reus
conveyance <sic>stiled</sic> a <add>the</add> Last-Will of Defunctusl. 4. In<lb/>
3. Existence of Defunctus
that same last will a portion of discourse having<lb/>
will
the effect of a bequest of the sum in question in favour<lb/>
4. Bequest to Actpr
of Actor: 5. on the part of the aggregate of the property<lb/>
5. Sufficiency of Defunctus
of Defunctus capable of being converted into money<lb/>
property to pay
the quantity sufficient for the <del><gap/></del> payment of the amount<lb/>
Actor's legacy
of the said Legacy <add>all Legacies</add>, after the satisfaction of all demand<lb/>
6. Do to pay all other
to which the law has given the precedence over that which<lb/>
legacies bequeathed by
is given to a Legatee: 6. On the part of such Legacy<lb/>
Defunctus
fund the amount sufficient for <del><gap/></del> payment <add>of the entire amount</add> not only of<lb/>
the legacy left to Actor, but of all the other Legatees of<lb/>
the said Defunctus</p>


To enable Actor to receive of Reus a sum
<note>2<lb/>
of money on the ground of the having sum bequeathed
Under JB's proposed<lb/>
to him by Defunctus, three antecedent concurrent states of things
system<lb/>
or events in the character of efficient causes of right
In his Postmortem<lb/>
or title are necessary: namely 1. Death of Defunctus.
distribution Code forms<lb/>
2. Operation of some sort or other performed by Reus,
of Legacy demand paper</note>
in the character of Executor or Administrator of in relation to the property
 
of Defunctus. 3. the existence of the sort of
<p>This being the case what is the course that would<lb/>
conveyance stiled a the Last-Will of Defunctusl. 4. In
be taken by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham? that under M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Benthams <unclear>plea</unclear><lb/>
that same last will a portion of discourse having
would take place?</p>
the effect of a bequest of the sum in question in fvour
 
of Actor: 5.  
<p>In his appropriate Code (say his <hi rend="underline">Post-mortuary<lb/>
Distribution Code</hi>) a Form <add>of a Demand-paper</add> would be provided for demand<lb/>
to be made of a Legacy: and direction would <unclear>thereon</unclear> be<lb/>
given for every legatee in case of contestation commenced<lb/>
or apprehended to make application to the Judge in the Justice<lb/>
Chamber with one of these blank forms either ready filled up<lb/>
<add>by</add><lb/>
<note>the applicant, or in<lb/>
case of his inability<lb/>
by reason of <unclear>estate</unclear><lb/>
ignorance combined<lb/>
with indigence, to be<lb/>
filled up by the Judge<lb/>
after <del><gap/></del> of<lb/>
the establishment of the several abovementioned facts, by <del><gap/></del> <add>means</add> of provisionally sufficient evidence elicited, by the examination of the applicant &#x2014; <unclear>namely</unclear> &#x2014;<lb/>
Actor, the self <sic>alledged</sic> Legatee.</note></p>





Revision as of 08:18, 8 November 2023

Click Here To Edit

1830 July 23
Review

M

Chicanera
3. Legacia

III. Enter now Chicanera Legacia

1
To enable Actor to
receive of Reus money
bequeathed by Defunctus
antecedent collative
events necessary
1. Death of Defunctus
2. Administration by
Reus
3. Existence of Defunctus
will
4. Bequest to Actor
5. Sufficiency of Defunctus
property to pay
Actor's legacy
6. Do to pay all other
legacies bequeathed by
Defunctus

To enable Actor to receive of Reus a sum
of money on the ground of the having Sum bequeathed
to him by Defunctus, three antecedent concurrent states of things
or events in the character of efficient causes of right
or title are necessary: namely 1. Death of Defunctus.
2. Operation of some sort or other performed by Reus,
in the character of Execution or Administration of in relation to the property
of Defunctus. 3. the existence of the sort of
conveyance stiled a the Last-Will of Defunctusl. 4. In
that same last will a portion of discourse having
the effect of a bequest of the sum in question in favour
of Actor: 5. on the part of the aggregate of the property
of Defunctus capable of being converted into money
the quantity sufficient for the payment of the amount
of the said Legacy all Legacies, after the satisfaction of all demand
to which the law has given the precedence over that which
is given to a Legatee: 6. On the part of such Legacy
fund the amount sufficient for payment of the entire amount not only of
the legacy left to Actor, but of all the other Legatees of
the said Defunctus

2
Under JB's proposed
system
In his Postmortem
distribution Code forms
of Legacy demand paper

This being the case what is the course that would
be taken by Mr Bentham? that under Mr Benthams plea
would take place?

In his appropriate Code (say his Post-mortuary
Distribution Code
) a Form of a Demand-paper would be provided for demand
to be made of a Legacy: and direction would thereon be
given for every legatee in case of contestation commenced
or apprehended to make application to the Judge in the Justice
Chamber with one of these blank forms either ready filled up
by
the applicant, or in
case of his inability
by reason of estate
ignorance combined
with indigence, to be
filled up by the Judge
after of
the establishment of the several abovementioned facts, by means of provisionally sufficient evidence elicited, by the examination of the applicant — namely
Actor, the self alledged Legatee.




Identifier: | JB/004/137/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-07-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

137

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

2058

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in