★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1830 July<lb/> | |||
Review</head> | |||
<note>Chicaneria<lb/> | |||
3. Legacia</note> | |||
<note>12<lb/> | |||
Under proposed<lb/> | |||
bill complicated<lb/> | |||
proceedings in Common<lb/> | |||
law Courts</note> | |||
<p>Common Lawyers (continues <add>says</add> she) look at my Bill. Action<lb/> | |||
upon Action. Jury upon Jury, Motion upon Motion, Affidavit<lb/> | |||
work upon Affidavit work by §.73 power is given to<lb/> | |||
my Judge in Ordinary "to direct a case to be stated for the<lb/> | |||
opinion of one of the Courts either of Law or Equity, or<lb/> | |||
Westminster Hall, so that, <unclear>both</unclear> of you Common Lawyers as<lb/> | |||
well as Equity Lawyers, you have more or less to gain by the<lb/> | |||
bargain, nothing to lose by it. To be <unclear>sure</unclear> in this same <add>§:</add> 72<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/> | |||
Section, the consent of parties is spoken of as necessary.<lb/> | |||
But then what is meant by parties: what but their Solicitors:<lb/> | |||
<note>not the parties, who<lb/> | |||
will <del><gap/></del> not be there</note><lb/> | |||
and upon any <add><gap/></add> proper occasion from a <unclear>quote so timed</unclear><lb/> | |||
can consent in such a case be come doubted of <add>matter of doubt.</add></p> | |||
<p>So much for the Westminster Hall Courts. But as to my<lb/> | |||
<del>own Court <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <add><gap/><gap/></add><lb/> | |||
my dear children Reader if you are without mouth watering<lb/> | |||
and lips licking</del><lb/> | |||
own Court, see <del><gap/></del> <add>how</add> rich the provision made for my<lb/> | |||
own dear children. Look at it, if you can, without<lb/> | |||
mouth-watering and lips licking</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1830 July
Review
Chicaneria
3. Legacia
12
Under proposed
bill complicated
proceedings in Common
law Courts
Common Lawyers (continues says she) look at my Bill. Action
upon Action. Jury upon Jury, Motion upon Motion, Affidavit
work upon Affidavit work by §.73 power is given to
my Judge in Ordinary "to direct a case to be stated for the
opinion of one of the Courts either of Law or Equity, or
Westminster Hall, so that, both of you Common Lawyers as
well as Equity Lawyers, you have more or less to gain by the
bargain, nothing to lose by it. To be sure in this same §: 72d
Section, the consent of parties is spoken of as necessary.
But then what is meant by parties: what but their Solicitors:
not the parties, who
will not be there
and upon any proper occasion from a quote so timed
can consent in such a case be come doubted of matter of doubt.
So much for the Westminster Hall Courts. But as to my
own Court
my dear children Reader if you are without mouth watering
and lips licking
own Court, see how rich the provision made for my
own dear children. Look at it, if you can, without
mouth-watering and lips licking
|
Identifier: | JB/004/141/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-07 |
12 |
||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
141 |
review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
2062 |
|||
