JB/054/111/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/054/111/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 23: Line 23:
its modes.  Evidence is fallacious, in so far as the<lb/>
its modes.  Evidence is fallacious, in so far as the<lb/>
conclusion drawn from it in relation to the facts in question<lb/>
conclusion drawn from it in relation to the facts in question<lb/>
is erroneous.  Of this quality the modes <will be different <add>exhibited<lb/>
is erroneous.  Of this quality the modes will be different <add>exhibited<lb/>
differences corresponding</add> according to the difference as between source and<lb/>
differences corresponding</add> according to the difference as between source and<lb/>
source.</p>
source.</p>
Line 40: Line 40:
<p>12.  Improper causes of exclusion – danger of deception – vexation in certain cases.</p>
<p>12.  Improper causes of exclusion – danger of deception – vexation in certain cases.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:47, 14 November 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825 May July 3
Procedure CodeCh. Evidence
§. 1. Consideranda

Copied into a General Head of

§. 1. Evidence (judicial evidence) in general – consideranda division of the subject

Art. 1. In regard to evidence, the following are
the subjects that require to be considered – the following
the heads under one or other of which the whole
of the matter belonging to this subject indicated
by this all comprehensive term may be arranged.

1. Why and how far needed.

II. Subject Evidence – its subject matter – facts of all sorts

2. Qualities desirable in it

2. Evidence – sources from whence it is desirable

4. Shapes it wears in each source

5. Evidence – its sources – how to obtain access to this
respectively for the purpose of checking the evidence
respectively derivable from them.

6. Deceptiveness or say fallaciousness on the part of evidence
its modes. Evidence is fallacious, in so far as the
conclusion drawn from it in relation to the facts in question
is erroneous. Of this quality the modes will be different exhibited
differences corresponding
according to the difference as between source and
source.

7. Deceptiousness its causes in regard had corresponding to the case of the different
modes.

8. Elicitation – modes of effecting it (the sources being
within reach) no such manner sort as to obtain it in
possession of the several qualities desirable in it

9. Probative force – how to for take measure of it – how
to give expression to the degrees of it

10. Probative force – how to form a just estimate of it,
regard had to the modes and means of deceptiousness
or say fallaciousness

11. Evidence – proper causes of exclusion delay
vexation and expence – duration of vexation of disclosure.

12. Improper causes of exclusion – danger of deception – vexation in certain cases.


Identifier: | JB/054/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1825-07-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

054

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17630

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in