JB/034/140/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/140/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1823. Sept<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 3</p>
<head>Constitutional Code.</head>
<note>III Rationale<lb/>
Ch. Quasi Jury<lb/>
3&sect; Explanatory Observation<lb/>
&sect; . Adoptive features</note><lb/>
 
2. A distinct but <add>though</add> less obvious mode in which Jury <add>the part taken by a</add> <del>trial</del><lb/>
is subservient to the purpose of applying a bridle to the power of the<lb/>
<note>8<lb/>
Distinct though less<lb/>
obvious additional <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<del>of</del> check is - Judges obligation<lb/>to exhibit the ground<lb/>
of his <del>preceding</del> decision<lb/>
and preliminary procedings<lb/>
by apt explanations and<lb/>
reasons.<lb/>
1. If <add>thus seen to be</add> conformist, every<lb/>
thing is as it should be:<lb/>
2. in as far as an informable,<lb/>
by <del>absence</del> as<lb/>
inadequacy <add>as abusive</add> of reasons<lb/>
he sounds exposed: by<lb/>
absence of d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> he stands<lb/>
self- condemned</note><lb/>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 20:56, 25 November 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. Septr 3

Constitutional Code. III Rationale
Ch. Quasi Jury
3§ Explanatory Observation
§ . Adoptive features

2. A distinct but though less obvious mode in which Jury the part taken by a trial
is subservient to the purpose of applying a bridle to the power of the
8
Distinct though less
obvious additional
of check is - Judges obligation
to exhibit the ground
of his preceding decision
and preliminary procedings
by apt explanations and
reasons.
1. If thus seen to be conformist, every
thing is as it should be:
2. in as far as an informable,
by absence as
inadequacy as abusive of reasons
he sounds exposed: by
absence of do he stands
self- condemned




Identifier: | JB/034/140/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

48-49

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

140

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / d14 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10414

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in