JB/034/140/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/140/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
&sect; . Adoptive features</note><lb/>
&sect; . Adoptive features</note><lb/>


2. A distinct but <add>though</add> less obvious mode in which Jury <add>the part taken by a</add> <del>trial</del><lb/>
<p>2. A distinct but <add>though</add> less obvious mode in which Jury <add>the part taken by a</add> <del>trial</del><lb/>
is subservient to the purpose of applying a bridle to the power of the<lb/>
is subservient to the purpose of applying a bridle to the power of the<lb/>
<note>8<lb/>
<note>8<lb/>
Line 28: Line 28:
absence of d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> he stands<lb/>
absence of d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> he stands<lb/>
self- condemned</note><lb/>
self- condemned</note><lb/>
Judge is the obligation which <add>consequence over formidable</add> in this case this permanent functionary <lb/>
finds himself under of l<gap/>ing open in <add>before</add> the eyes of the<lb/>
put to the Jury and thence to the public such <add>observations</add> consideration<lb/>
in any s<gap/> at the same time to take a <add>ch<gap/> and</add> casual view<lb/>
of the nature of the case, and of the grounds of the decision<lb/>
whatsoever it be which he determines himself to
pronounce<lb/>
in <gap/>bative to it. In this state of things either his decision <lb/>
is informative to the dictates of <del>the</del> justice: evil is in some way<lb/>
as either unconformable: in the first case every thing is as it should<lb/>
be: in the other case, either he gives <del>no</del> <add><!-- Pencil insert -->adequate</add> <gap/> reasons<lb/>
for in this case such in the supposition they can not be, or<lb/>
he gives no reasons: <del>in</del> the first <del>case he</del> course he can not<lb/>
taken without exposing himself <add>to a certainty</add> more or less to public shame no<lb/>
reproach,- in the other case <del>by h</del>is silence where <del>h<gap/></del><lb/>
were any inefficient reasons <add>in that idea</add> to be found he sits as it were<lb/>
self condemned.</p>
<note>49<lb/>
Different <del>in their</del> form<lb/>
simple publicity so<lb/>
this position <del>obligation</del><lb/>
<del>to reside</del> account rendering<lb/>
obligation. <add>To any extent</add> Publicity<lb/>
may have place<lb/></note><lb/>
Distinct it is evident from the more publicity of the<lb/>
proceedings is the feature thus stated as peculiar to Jury trial<lb/>





Revision as of 18:25, 1 December 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. Septr 3

Constitutional Code. III Rationale
Ch. Quasi Jury
3§ Explanatory Observation
§ . Adoptive features

2. A distinct but though less obvious mode in which Jury the part taken by a trial
is subservient to the purpose of applying a bridle to the power of the
8
Distinct though less
obvious additional
of check is - Judges obligation
to exhibit the ground
of his preceding decision
and preliminary procedings
by apt explanations and
reasons.
1. If thus seen to be conformist, every
thing is as it should be:
2. in as far as an informable,
by absence as
inadequacy as abusive of reasons
he sounds exposed: by
absence of do he stands
self- condemned

Judge is the obligation which consequence over formidable in this case this permanent functionary
finds himself under of ling open in before the eyes of the
put to the Jury and thence to the public such observations consideration
in any s at the same time to take a ch and casual view
of the nature of the case, and of the grounds of the decision
whatsoever it be which he determines himself to pronounce
in bative to it. In this state of things either his decision
is informative to the dictates of the justice: evil is in some way
as either unconformable: in the first case every thing is as it should
be: in the other case, either he gives no adequate reasons
for in this case such in the supposition they can not be, or
he gives no reasons: in the first case he course he can not
taken without exposing himself to a certainty more or less to public shame no
reproach,- in the other case by his silence where h
were any inefficient reasons in that idea to be found he sits as it were
self condemned.

49
Different in their form
simple publicity so
this position obligation
to reside account rendering
obligation. To any extent Publicity
may have place

Distinct it is evident from the more publicity of the
proceedings is the feature thus stated as peculiar to Jury trial






Identifier: | JB/034/140/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

48-49

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

140

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / d14 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10414

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in