★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 May 24<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>§.II Elucidation<lb/>§ <del><gap/></del><lb/>§ French Procedures<lb/>Bonapartes</note></p> <!-- pencil bracket of the text in the right hand margin --> <p><foreign>Avocées</foreign> met, thereafter goes | <head>1829 May 24<lb/>Petitions</head> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>§.II Elucidation<lb/>§ <del><gap/></del><lb/>§ French Procedures<lb/>Bonapartes</note></p> <!-- pencil bracket of the text in the right hand margin --> <p><foreign>Avocées</foreign> met, thereafter goes on special pleading with <sic>fixt</sic> intervals<lb/>much as in England except that this plague of notes and reactions is<lb/>not near so great <sic>fixt</sic> intervals for allegation on one part after allegation<lb/>on the other, under the benefit of the <unclear>mendacity law</unclear>: for<lb/>evidence in all shapes proposed kept back. <del>Stated</del> As to a party<lb/>should it happen to them to be present from first to last, <del>not a question<lb/>can either put to the other</del> not by or for either can a question be<lb/>put to the other, <del><gap/></del> except in a case represented as an extraordinary<lb/>case: to wit by interrogation <unclear>some</unclear> facts it <unclear>aduces</unclear>: a<lb/>formality retained from the old law p 324 with shamelessly useless<lb/><del>first</del> provision formulation and delay. A man who be as a party<lb/>is good to defend <gap/> of <del><gap/></del> <gap/> from a man when he is a witness<lb/><del><gap/></del> For excluding his evidence possible present interest is sufficient when<lb/>he not <sic>stiled</sic> a party <add>witness, certain interest</add> none at all when he is one.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1829 May 24
Petitions
Supplement
§.II Elucidation
§
§ French Procedures
Bonapartes
Avocées met, thereafter goes on special pleading with fixt intervals
much as in England except that this plague of notes and reactions is
not near so great fixt intervals for allegation on one part after allegation
on the other, under the benefit of the mendacity law: for
evidence in all shapes proposed kept back. Stated As to a party
should it happen to them to be present from first to last, not a question
can either put to the other not by or for either can a question be
put to the other, except in a case represented as an extraordinary
case: to wit by interrogation some facts it aduces: a
formality retained from the old law p 324 with shamelessly useless
first provision formulation and delay. A man who be as a party
is good to defend of from a man when he is a witness
For excluding his evidence possible present interest is sufficient when
he not stiled a party witness, certain interest none at all when he is one.
|
Identifier: | JB/081/371/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-05-24 |
|||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
371 |
petitions |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
26158 |
|||
