JB/034/141/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/141/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
to be made correct<lb/>
to be made correct<lb/>
and compleat by interrogation: and not <del>strain</del> through the <add><unclear>similar</unclear></add> <del>purparty</del> vitiating medium of pain [+]</note><lb/>
and compleat by interrogation: and not <del>strain</del> through the <add><unclear>similar</unclear></add> <del>purparty</del> vitiating medium of pain [+]</note><lb/>
<p>3. Third distinguishable mode in which the <del>ends of</del> Jury system<lb/>
as established <add>in the <gap/> in which it is in use</add> has been conducive to to the ends of justice, <add>causing</add> securing<lb/>
<del>the exhalation</del> evidence to continue to be received in the <del>least</del><lb/>
<del>decapt<gap/> <gap/> that to say the oral shape</del> <add>the most</add> best shape.<lb/>
namely that in which it passes immediately from the lips<lb/>
of the relating witness to the ear of the Judge and the <lb/>
surrounding auditory, without being strained through the<lb/>
bes<gap/> of <del>of</del> professional or official instruments or both, paid<lb/>
<add>all of them</add> at the rate of so much a word for initiating it.</p>
Neither is this feature inseparable in its nature<lb/>
from Jury procedure  Neither in this instance is there<lb/>
any thing in the nature of evidence on the one hand or<lb/>
of Jury procedure on the other that render that
<del>forbids</del><lb/>
<del>the reception of</del> <add>render it more prevents difficulty to receive evidence in this</add> <del>excludes evidence for being <gap/> in the</del><lb/>
<del>form</del> shape in any other sort of Judicatory there in that<lb/>
of which a Jury forms a part. IN relation to a fact open<lb/>
to dispute, no Judge <add>nor other ruling functionaries </add> that really wished to to come at the truth<lb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 17:34, 13 December 2023

Click Here To Edit

1828 Septr. 4

Constitutional Code.

III. Rationale
Ch Quasi-Jury
§ 1. Additional features
Tru Sheet
3. Tis service to ends
of power & securing to evidence
the most apt shape where
obtainable: viz when
without any valuation dence
it passes, in
presence of the auditory
form the lips of thea relating
witness to the case
of the judge by whom
decision is grounded on it
is pronounced: subject
to be made correct
and compleat by interrogation: and not strain through the similar purparty vitiating medium of pain [+]

3. Third distinguishable mode in which the ends of Jury system
as established in the in which it is in use has been conducive to to the ends of justice, causing securing
the exhalation evidence to continue to be received in the least
decapt that to say the oral shape the most best shape.
namely that in which it passes immediately from the lips
of the relating witness to the ear of the Judge and the
surrounding auditory, without being strained through the
bes of of professional or official instruments or both, paid
all of them at the rate of so much a word for initiating it.

Neither is this feature inseparable in its nature
from Jury procedure Neither in this instance is there
any thing in the nature of evidence on the one hand or
of Jury procedure on the other that render that forbids
the reception of render it more prevents difficulty to receive evidence in this excludes evidence for being in the
form shape in any other sort of Judicatory there in that
of which a Jury forms a part. IN relation to a fact open
to dispute, no Judge nor other ruling functionaries that really wished to to come at the truth






Identifier: | JB/034/141/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

50-53

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

141

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / c1 / d15 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10415

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in