JB/118/381/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/381/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/118/381/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/381/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/381/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><hi rend="underline">bound</hi> to anything, be at <hi rend="underline">liberty</hi> to give as much<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
as they thought advisable, on any <hi rend="underline">one</hi> of them.</p>
 
<p>As to the fair real amount of this loss or anything<lb/>
 
approaching to it, <add>viz. the loss of the non-fulfillment of the Contract,</add> it is a vast deal more<lb/>
 
than were they ever so desirous, it would be in<lb/>
their <hi rend="underline">power</hi> to give.</p>
<p>But, though on this score they could not give<lb/>
so much as would be justly due, or so much <add>as,</add> in so<lb/>
far as it could be liquidated, would be given in a<lb/>
question between individual and individual, it<lb/>
is surely no reason why the injured individual<lb/>
should receive nothing on this score.</p>
<p>Were the claim put simply and distinctly<lb/>
upon the last item, in this case, suppose for<lb/>
example they were convinced that £50,000<lb/>
were really much less than the probable amount<lb/>
of it during the two lives, an allowance to<lb/>
this amount, inferior as by the supposition it<lb/>
would be to what the individual ought to <hi rend="underline">receive</hi>,<lb/>
would however be so large a sum of public money<lb/>
for Government to <hi rend="underline">give</hi> – so large a sum to<lb/>
sacrifice to the difference between the approved<lb/>
and the rejected plan of management, – that shame<lb/>
and apprehension would effectually prevent their<lb/>
giving it.</p>
<p>As to the system of mechanical inventions,<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">that</hi> (it is to be remembered) was the<lb/>
invention of General Bentham, who of course<lb/>
would have had a large share in the profits of<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">private</hi> establishment, and who accordingly<lb/>
was by the <hi rend="underline">Contract</hi>, to have had his life interest<lb/>
<add>in</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:38, 20 December 2023

Click Here To Edit

bound to anything, be at liberty to give as much
as they thought advisable, on any one of them.

As to the fair real amount of this loss or anything
approaching to it, viz. the loss of the non-fulfillment of the Contract, it is a vast deal more
than were they ever so desirous, it would be in
their power to give.

But, though on this score they could not give
so much as would be justly due, or so much as, in so
far as it could be liquidated, would be given in a
question between individual and individual, it
is surely no reason why the injured individual
should receive nothing on this score.

Were the claim put simply and distinctly
upon the last item, in this case, suppose for
example they were convinced that £50,000
were really much less than the probable amount
of it during the two lives, an allowance to
this amount, inferior as by the supposition it
would be to what the individual ought to receive,
would however be so large a sum of public money
for Government to give – so large a sum to
sacrifice to the difference between the approved
and the rejected plan of management, – that shame
and apprehension would effectually prevent their
giving it.

As to the system of mechanical inventions,
that (it is to be remembered) was the
invention of General Bentham, who of course
would have had a large share in the profits of
the private establishment, and who accordingly
was by the Contract, to have had his life interest
in


Identifier: | JB/118/381/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

381

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

tissue paper

ID Number

39435

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in