JB/051/292/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/292/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




under construction by Diane Folan ... please do not amend!


<head>Judges  <!-- white space --> x Nat . Assembly Court</head><!-- written in pencil -->
<p><del>such a power may be called for .</del> 


<head>Judges  <!-- white space --> x Nat . <gap/> <unclear>Court</unclear></head><!-- written in pencil -->
<!-- pencil line sectioning off the last sentence from the next one, though it's not strictly speaking a horizontal line --> <note>6 Civil Appeal why none to the National Assembly</note><!-- note in pencil --> Upwards of a century
<p><del>such a power may be called for .</del>  <!-- pencil line sectioning off the last sentence from the next one, though it's not strictly speaking a horizontal line -->  Upwards of a century
<lb/>
<lb/>
and a half has elapsed since the <add>sole</add> Judge of our
and a half has elapsed since the <add>sole</add> Judge of our
Line 18: Line 18:
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


 
<p><!-- indented -->In cases of blameless error the real mischief <del>can
<lb/>
never be considerable</del>  being confined to the individual
<lb/>
cause <add>occasion</add> never can be very considerable : if it consisted
<lb/>
in <del>an interpretation</del> a construction of the law contrary
<lb/>
to the sense if the legislature , <del>the</del> <add>all</add> future bad consequences
<lb/>
in <gap/><!-- looks like 'futurism' ? --> might be prevented by an interpretative
<lb/>
declaration of the legislative body acting
<lb/>
as such .  The want of retrospective effect would
<lb/>
<del>leave</del> <add>deprive</add> the parties of all interest in taking up the
<lb/>
time of the legislature with applications made on
<lb/>
their individual account .
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 02:13, 8 January 2012

Click Here To Edit


Judges x Nat . Assembly Court

such a power may be called for . 6 Civil Appeal why none to the National Assembly Upwards of a century
and a half has elapsed since the sole Judge of our
enormous court of the Chancery Equity has been so much as
suspected of any crime committed in his capacity
of Judge .

In cases of blameless error the real mischief can
never be considerable
being confined to the individual
cause occasion never can be very considerable : if it consisted
in an interpretation a construction of the law contrary
to the sense if the legislature , the all future bad consequences
in might be prevented by an interpretative
declaration of the legislative body acting
as such . The want of retrospective effect would
leave deprive the parties of all interest in taking up the
time of the legislature with applications made on
their individual account .



Identifier: | JB/051/292/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

6

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

292

Info in main headings field

judges

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16457

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in