JB/031/020/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:19, 29 January 2024

1828 Aug. 7
Blackstone

8
Beginning
3

These distinctions of
different cases of possession
immaterial — their
origin in feudal times

Altogether immaterial in themselves are the distinctions
the case designated respectively by the appellation
of possession — ac right apparent right of possession, actual right of
possession and right of property: but of the state of thought
in the widely time called feudal , sprang the
positions for making these distinctions.

Labour secure to comprehend
them — success
precarious

Secure would be the labour of endeavouring to comprehend
them: precarious the success of the attempt.

Right or no right only
proper question

Have you I a right, or have you I not? that is a proper
question: that the only one.

Without consent of certain
person can you derive
benefit from the
thing in question without
a suit? Of this question
your interest to be always
satisfied.

Without or against the counsel of a person or
persons respectively, may you derive for the thing in question the
benefit in question — without having recourse to a suit at law?
this is the question which the same question which in relation on every occasion
it is your interest to be satisfied.

Power absqualilegational
in relation to habitation moveable
or immoveable (Ship)</note>

Power absqualilegational in relation to

Identifier: \| JB/031/020/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.
Date_1	1828-08-07	Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	031	Main Headings	civil code
Folio number	020	Info in main headings field	blackstone
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d8 / e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	b&m 1828
Marginals	richard doane	Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1828
Notes public		ID Number	9706
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/031/020/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p>1828 Aug. 7<lb/>
-<head>Blackstone</head></p>
+<head>1828 Aug. 7<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- figures and marginal summaries in pencil --> <p>8<lb/><note>Beginning</note><lb/>3</p> <p><note>These distinctions of<lb/>different cases of possession<lb/>immaterial &#x2014; their<lb/>origin in feudal times</note></p><p>Altogether immaterial in themselves are the distinctions<lb/><gap/> the <gap/> case designated respectively by the appellation<lb/>
-<p>Altogether <unclear>unnatural</unclear> in <unclear>thinking</unclear> are the <unclear>distinctions</unclear><lb/>
+of possession &#x2014; <del><add>ac</add> right</del> apparent right of possession, actual right of<lb/>possession and right of property:  but of the state of thought<lb/>in the widely <gap/> time called  feudal <gap/>, sprang the<lb/>positions for making these distinctions.</p> <p><note>Labour secure to comprehend<lb/>them &#x2014; success<lb/>precarious</note></p> <p>Secure would be the labour of endeavouring to comprehend<lb/>them:  precarious the success of the attempt.</p> <p><note>Right or no right only<lb/>proper question</note></p> <p>Have you <add>I</add> a right, or have you <add>I</add> not? that is <hi rend="underline">a</hi> proper<lb/>question:  that <hi rend="underline">the</hi> only one.</p> <p><note>Without consent of certain<lb/>person can you derive<lb/>benefit from the<lb/>thing in question without<lb/>a suit?  Of this question<lb/>your interest to be always<lb/>satisfied.</note></p>
-<unclear>between</unclear> the <unclear>several</unclear> case designated respectively by the appellation<lb/>
+<p>Without or against the counsel of a <gap/> person or<lb/>persons respectively, may you derive for the thing in question the<lb/>
-of possession – <del><add>ac</add> right</del> apparent right of possession, actual right of<lb/>
+benefit in question &#x2014; without having recourse to a suit at law?<lb/>this is the question <del>which</del> the same question which <add>in relation</add> on every occasion<lb/>it is your interest to be satisfied.</p> Power <unclear>absqualilegational</unclear><lb/>in relation to habitation moveable<lb/>or immoveable (Ship)</note></p> <p>Power <unclear>absqualilegational</unclear> in relation to
-possession and right of property:  but of the state of thought<lb/>
-in the widely <gap/> time called  feudal <gap/>, sprang the<lb/>
-pretences for making these distinctions.</p>
-<p><unclear>Severe</unclear> would be the labour of endeavouring to comprehend<lb/>
-them:  precarious the success of the attempt.</p>
-<p>Have you <add>I</add> a right, or have you <add>I</add> not? that is <hi rend="underline">a</hi> proper<lb/>
-question:  that <hi rend="underline">the</hi> only one.</p>
-<p>Without or against the <gap/> of a <gap/> person or<lb/>
-persons respectively, may you derive for the thing in question the<lb/>
-benefit in question – without <gap/> recourse to a suit at law?<lb/>
-this is the question <del>which</del> the same question which <add>in relation</add> on every occasion<lb/>
-it is your interest to be satisfied.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Views

JB/031/020/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:19, 29 January 2024

Navigation

Search