JB/031/027/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/031/027/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1828 <sic>Aug.</sic> 26<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>5 <note>?<lb/>&sect;.2 Universal Jurisprudence<lb/>1. Register</note></p> <p>Right applicable</note></p> <!-- first paragraph and associated marginal additions crossed though on pencil --> <p>I<lb/>Right extrajudicially as well as judicially <add>exercisable</add> <del><gap/><lb/><add><del>or say <gap/></del> right no otherwise than judicially <del>applicable or avoidable</del> exercisable</add> [+] <note>extrajudicially exercisable<lb/>those which may be exercisable<lb/>without making application to<lb/>a court of justice judicially<lb/>those which are not exercisable<lb/>otherwise than by application<lb/>made to a court of justice.</note><lb/><del>of</del> no small importance in practice are<lb/>those <gap/> when employed in giving a <add>in the</add> description of<lb/>the effect of legal possession <add>in relation to a subject matter of property</add> in the several diversifications<lb/>of which it is susceptible. <add>that species of subject matter is susceptible</add>  In the first case  <hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> Yes <del>a <gap/></del> <gap/><lb/>not small in the importance:<lb/>for in the<lb/>first case, the benefit<lb/>is shared <add><del>my</dell in</add> by every man<lb/>in the other <add>by</add> no more<lb/>than one or perhaps<lb/>two, no more likely twenty<lb/>still more likely, perhaps<lb/>a hundred</note> <add>under law as also</add> speak of the<lb/>wrongdoer. the party wronged have a <del>choice</del> <add>chance</add> such as it<lb/>is <del>of <gap/> <gap/> such as it may <gap/></del> to<lb/><del>the <gap/></del> <add>of enjoying the benefit of his right without charging himself<lb/>in the first place with a <sic>burthen</sic> say of ten <gap/> of </gap/></add> in the other case, no such <gap/> has he,<Lb/><gap/> of fifty <gap/> frequently of a hundred <gap/> or more than<lb/>a hundred than the value of it</add> otherwise than through the <gap/> of a law suit, no such<lb/>choice has he, without a saw suit. <!-- margin note ref in pencil --><hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi>  <gap/> are the </add> weight of</add> expenses<lb/>with which the faculty <add>liberty</add> of making application to the Judge for<lb/>remedy against wrong, and for means <add>liberty</add> of self-defence against<lb/>wrong by undue compliance with undue application for<lb/>a remedy where none is due.</p> <!-- end of crossed out section --> <p><note>Rights 2 species of &#x2014;<lb/>1. Those the exercise of<lb/>which supposes no antecedent<lb/>wrong &#x2014;<lb/>2. Those which do suppose</note></p> <p>Right the exercise of which <add>does not</add> suppose <del>and <gap/></del><lb/>antecedent wrong &#x2014; <add><del>on the pa</del> committed by some other person</add> rights the exercise of which <hi rend="underline">do not</hi><lb/>suppose antecedent wrong committed [<!-- bracket and deletion in pencil --> [<del>by some other person</del> into those two classes or say species <del>the<lb/>then right</del> require in the first place to be distinguished <add>those</add><lb/><del>those rights which <add>by increase of</add> are extra judicially exercisable of</del><lb/><add>rights of which, for the exploration of the difference between the <del>existence applicability</del> case in<lb/><which the word<lb/>possession is applicable<lb/>and those in which<lb/>it is not applicable,<lb/>and the cases in which<lb/>it is not<lb/>applicable<lb/>the existence and non<lb/>non-existence requires<lb/>to be brought to view</add></p> <p>The right which you have of wearing that same<lb/>coat of yours you possess <del>whether</del <add>as well when</add> in relation to it no<lb/>wrong has been done to you by any body &#x2014; by Cupester,<lb/>by the <sic>tayler,</sic> or by any body as when <add>in relation to it a wrong has</add> by somebody<lb/>been done to it.  So likewise the right of taking it with<lb/>your own hands or any body elses, if so it be that neither<l/?><the <sic>tayler</sic> nor any body else does any thing in the intention and with the effect of your<lb/>getting it back.  In both<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> these cases the fact of your being during the whole time in question in possession <add>legal possession</add> of the coat is indubitable.</p>
<head>1828 <sic>Aug.</sic> 26<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>5 <note>?<lb/>&sect;.2 Universal Jurisprudence<lb/>1. Register</note></p> <p><note>Right applicable</note></p> <!-- first paragraph and associated marginal additions crossed though on pencil --> <p>I<lb/>Right extrajudicially as well as judicially <add>exercisable</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/><add><del>or say available</del> right no otherwise than judicially <del>applicable or available</del> exercisable</add> [+] <note>extrajudicially exercisable<lb/>those which may be exercisable<lb/>without making application to<lb/>a court of justice judicially<lb/>those which are not exercisable<lb/>otherwise than by application<lb/>made to a court of justice.</note><lb/><del>of</del> no small importance in practice are<lb/>those distinctions when employed in giving a <add>in the</add> description of<lb/>the effect of <hi rend="underline">legal possession</hi> <add>in relation to a subject matter of property</add> in the several descriptions<lb/>of which it is susceptible. <add>that species of subject matter is susceptible</add>  In the first case  <hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> Yes <del>a <gap/></del> <gap/><lb/>not small in the importance:<lb/>for in the<lb/>first case, the benefit<lb/>is shared <add><del>my</dell in</add> by every man<lb/>in the other <add>by</add> no more<lb/>than one or perhaps<lb/>two, no more likely twenty<lb/>still more likely, perhaps<lb/>a hundred</note> <add>under law as also</add> speak of the<lb/>wrongdoer. the party wronged have a <del>choice</del> <add>chance</add> such as it<lb/>is <del>of <gap/> <gap/> such as it may <gap/></del> to<lb/><del>the <gap/></del> <add>of enjoying the benefit of his right without charging himself<lb/>in the first place with a <sic>burthen</sic> say of ten <gap/> of </gap/></add> in the other case, no such <gap/> has he,<Lb/><gap/> of fifty <gap/> frequently of a hundred <gap/> or more than<lb/>a hundred than the value of it</add> otherwise than through the <gap/> of a law suit, no such<lb/>choice has he, without a saw suit. <!-- margin note ref in pencil --><hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi>  <gap/> are the </add> weight of</add> expenses<lb/>with which the faculty <add>liberty</add> of making application to the Judge for<lb/>remedy against wrong, and for means <add>liberty</add> of self-defence against<lb/>wrong by undue compliance with undue application for<lb/>a remedy where none is due.</p> <!-- end of crossed out section --> <p><note>Rights 2 species of &#x2014;<lb/>1. Those the exercise of<lb/>which supposes no antecedent<lb/>wrong &#x2014;<lb/>2. Those which do suppose</note></p> <p>Right the exercise of which <add>does not</add> suppose <del>and <gap/></del><lb/>antecedent wrong &#x2014; <add><del>on the pa</del> committed by some other person</add> rights the exercise of which <hi rend="underline">do not</hi><lb/>suppose antecedent wrong committed [<!-- bracket and deletion in pencil --> [<del>by some other person</del> into those two classes or say species <del>the<lb/>then right</del> require in the first place to be distinguished <add>those</add><lb/><del>those rights which <add>by increase of</add> are extra judicially exercisable of</del><lb/><add>rights of which, for the exploration of the difference between the <del>existence applicability</del> case in<lb/><which the word<lb/>possession is applicable<lb/>and those in which<lb/>it is not applicable,<lb/>and the cases in which<lb/>it is not<lb/>applicable<lb/>the existence and non<lb/>non-existence requires<lb/>to be brought to view</add></p> <p>The right which you have of wearing that same<lb/>coat of yours you possess <del>whether</del> <add>as well when</add> in relation to it no<lb/>wrong has been done to you by any body &#x2014; by Cupester,<lb/>by the <sic>tayler,</sic> or by any body as when <add>in relation to it a wrong has</add> by somebody<lb/>been done to it.  So likewise the right of taking it with<lb/>your own hands or any body elses, if so it be that neither<lb/><the <sic>tayler</sic> nor any body else does any thing in the intention and with the effect of your<lb/>getting it back.  In both<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> these cases the fact of your being during the whole time in question in possession <add>legal possession</add> of the coat is indubitable.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 12:07, 1 February 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 Aug. 26
Blackstone

5 ?
§.2 Universal Jurisprudence
1. Register

Right applicable

I
Right extrajudicially as well as judicially exercisable
or say available right no otherwise than judicially applicable or available exercisable [+] extrajudicially exercisable
those which may be exercisable
without making application to
a court of justice judicially
those which are not exercisable
otherwise than by application
made to a court of justice.

of no small importance in practice are
those distinctions when employed in giving a in the description of
the effect of legal possession in relation to a subject matter of property in the several descriptions
of which it is susceptible. that species of subject matter is susceptible In the first case [+]2 [+]2 Yes a
not small in the importance:
for in the
first case, the benefit
is shared my</dell in by every man
in the other by no more
than one or perhaps
two, no more likely twenty
still more likely, perhaps
a hundred
under law as also speak of the
wrongdoer. the party wronged have a choice chance such as it
is of such as it may to
the of enjoying the benefit of his right without charging himself
in the first place with a burthen say of ten of </gap/>
in the other case, no such has he,
of fifty frequently of a hundred or more than
a hundred than the value of it</add> otherwise than through the of a law suit, no such
choice has he, without a saw suit. [+]2 are the </add> weight of</add> expenses
with which the faculty liberty of making application to the Judge for
remedy against wrong, and for means liberty of self-defence against
wrong by undue compliance with undue application for
a remedy where none is due.

Rights 2 species of —
1. Those the exercise of
which supposes no antecedent
wrong —
2. Those which do suppose

Right the exercise of which does not suppose and
antecedent wrong — on the pa committed by some other person rights the exercise of which do not
suppose antecedent wrong committed [ [by some other person into those two classes or say species the
then right
require in the first place to be distinguished those
those rights which by increase of are extra judicially exercisable of
rights of which, for the exploration of the difference between the existence applicability case in
<which the word
possession is applicable
and those in which
it is not applicable,
and the cases in which
it is not
applicable
the existence and non
non-existence requires
to be brought to view

The right which you have of wearing that same
coat of yours you possess whether as well when in relation to it no
wrong has been done to you by any body — by Cupester,
by the tayler, or by any body as when in relation to it a wrong has by somebody
been done to it. So likewise the right of taking it with
your own hands or any body elses, if so it be that neither
<the tayler nor any body else does any thing in the intention and with the effect of your
getting it back. In both
these cases the fact of your being during the whole time in question in possession legal possession of the coat is indubitable.



Identifier: | JB/031/027/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.

Date_1

1828-08-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

031

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

027

Info in main headings field

blackstone

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5?

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

richard doane

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

9713

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in