★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/106/226/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/226/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/106/226/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->6 | <p><!-- pencil -->6 March 1807</p> | ||
<p>Here my Lord, is a field – another noble field for these<lb/> | <p>Here my Lord, is a field – another noble field for these<lb/> | ||
<add> | <add>into</add> to exercise themselves in whose right the distinction between right<lb/> | ||
and wrong has no existence. Those rules all repugnant<lb/> | and wrong has no existence. Those rules all repugnant<lb/> | ||
to each other and all right: or if not all equally right<lb/> | to each other and all right: or if not all equally right<lb/> | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
It <del>is not fit</del> may not be fit, if the creditor is at once<lb/> | It <del>is not fit</del> may not be fit, if the creditor is at once<lb/> | ||
able and willing to administer to law learning this its<lb/> | able and willing to administer to law learning this its<lb/> | ||
additional | additional reward.</p> | ||
<p>In all this <unclear> | <p>In all this <unclear>seem</unclear>, will any matter of regret present itself <add>be discovered</add>?<lb/> | ||
– O yes: – that his Majesty has not more kingdoms, with<lb/> | – O yes: – that his Majesty has not more kingdoms, with<lb/> | ||
more inconsistencies, and more injustices: that the state of things <add>profligacy has<lb/> | more inconsistencies, and more injustices: that the state of things <add>profligacy has<lb/> | ||
no deeper | no deeper sink</add> affords no fouler <add><del><gap/> deeper pit of</del></add> prostitution, by which sordid <add>low</add> ambition <add>in high stations<lb/> | ||
earn the rewards that are as some fear it –</add> may prove by still more conspicuous demonstrations <del>that</del> its<lb/> | earn the rewards that are as some fear it –</add> may prove by still more conspicuous demonstrations <del>that</del> its<lb/> | ||
pursuance that the distinction per <foreign>fus et nefus</foreign> is a distinction<lb/> | pursuance that the distinction per <foreign>fus et nefus</foreign> is a distinction<lb/> | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
which, <add>by hands cloathed with power</add> no distinction ought ever to be made.</p> | which, <add>by hands cloathed with power</add> no distinction ought ever to be made.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
6 March 1807
Here my Lord, is a field – another noble field for these
into to exercise themselves in whose right the distinction between right
and wrong has no existence. Those rules all repugnant
to each other and all right: or if not all equally right
all equally fit to be upholden and preserved.
In Scotland it is fit that upon distributing so much
money among many the lawyer, debtor against whom judgment has
been given should for a certain greater or less number of years
be allowed to cheat their creditors.
In Ireland, this is not fit – on any terms.
In England it is fit, or not according to circumstances.
It is fit, unless the creditor will distribute a further sum of
money among the lawyers.
It is not fit may not be fit, if the creditor is at once
able and willing to administer to law learning this its
additional reward.
In all this seem, will any matter of regret present itself be discovered?
– O yes: – that his Majesty has not more kingdoms, with
more inconsistencies, and more injustices: that the state of things profligacy has
no deeper sink affords no fouler deeper pit of prostitution, by which sordid low ambition in high stations
earn the rewards that are as some fear it – may prove by still more conspicuous demonstrations that its
pursuance that the distinction per fus et nefus is a distinction
without a difference that fus and nefus are objects between
which, by hands cloathed with power no distinction ought ever to be made.
Identifier: | JB/106/226/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1807-03-06 |
|||
106 |
scotch reform |
||
226 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
34814 |
|||