JB/034/191/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/191/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript"><hi rend="underline">r..</hi></hi>19</p>
 
<head>Constitutional Code 1. Enactive Part</head>
<note>Ch. Quasi Jury<lb/>
S. Field of Service</note><lb/>
 
<p>Tardily, scarcely and doubtosely in his and then a <gap/><lb/>
of the field of law at widely distant <gap/> have been introduced<lb/>
a few scrapes of <gap/>qulant procedure. In some cases of pr<gap/><lb/>
injury <del>about</del> in the <add>the</add> contrary by the institution of the sub<lb/>
of Judge called a Justice of the Peace <add>admission was <gap/>bly give to</add> <del><gap/></del> imperfect made of investigation<lb/>
was Have <unclear>qui</unclear> received injury in the <gap/> <del><gap/></del> apply<lb/>
for <gap/> <add>some little</add> assistance in this shape is obtainable: apply for<lb/>
compensation without revenge in any other shape, <add>the assistance can</add> you apply to<lb/>
<add>you have</add><gap/> <gap/>: <del>apt</del> if you object be revenge your listening <lb/>
is as good as any other <gap/>: if you object to compensation<lb/>
so <gap/> is it that of <add><gap/> are the Judge</add> kind you would perjure yourself, that<lb/>
for the <gap/> of your suit they refuse to have you</p>
 
Not till<add>before</add> the middle of the 16<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Century <add>had arrived</add> above in offences<lb/>
of a <gap/> class investigational produce in<gap/>gational examination<lb/>
was in regard to certain class of offence for the <gap/><lb/>
have <gap/> and formally introduced. That this class of offences<lb/>
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 22:02, 17 February 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823. Oct<hi rend="underline">r..</hi>19

Constitutional Code 1. Enactive Part Ch. Quasi Jury
S. Field of Service

Tardily, scarcely and doubtosely in his and then a
of the field of law at widely distant have been introduced
a few scrapes of qulant procedure. In some cases of pr
injury about in the the contrary by the institution of the sub
of Judge called a Justice of the Peace admission was bly give to imperfect made of investigation
was Have qui received injury in the apply
for some little assistance in this shape is obtainable: apply for
compensation without revenge in any other shape, the assistance can you apply to
you have : apt if you object be revenge your listening
is as good as any other : if you object to compensation
so is it that of are the Judge kind you would perjure yourself, that
for the of your suit they refuse to have you

Not tillbefore the middle of the 16th Century had arrived above in offences
of a class investigational produce ingational examination
was in regard to certain class of offence for the
have and formally introduced. That this class of offences





Identifier: | JB/034/191/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-10-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

191

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10465

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in