JB/004/166/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/166/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1830 July 26
Review
 
Reinquiries
and
Removals
 
11
No limitation to the
irrelevant matter in
this document
 
Then again if the same Grounds <gap/> <gap/>
quality as well as quality of these same grounds these learned
Draughtsmen will not find themselves less at this way than in
the case of any <gap/> one of the a<gap/> plumbing: no exuberance flagrancy
of mendacity mendacious matter to no quantity of irrelevant matter is any
which a limitation so much as professed to be applied
 
12
Of the instrument
whatever its length
copy upon copy made
necessary
 
Then again of this <gap/> learned instrument
same <gap/> document <gap/> be the length of it what it will
then must be copy upon copy: and of these copies one
must or be entered (&sect; 41) with the Registrar in the book of
"the Court" (namely the Court of the Judge in Ordinary) found in charge
"before the Commission day," namely the day of the date of the Commission
in virtue of which the Judges of Assize have to sit.
But this same entry into this same book of the Registrar
how is it to be effective? Will he thus deal by it without
knowing what it is? <gap/> For the he knowing what it is
is there any way other than his having read it or heard it read?
and for the <gap/> performance of this best &#x2014; where is what is to be
his inducement: his inducement in the instance of so much as
a single one of these "Notices,": much more less in the instance of
the






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:23, 29 February 2024

Click Here To Edit

1830 July 26 Review

Reinquiries and Removals

11 No limitation to the irrelevant matter in this document

Then again if the same Grounds quality as well as quality of these same grounds these learned Draughtsmen will not find themselves less at this way than in the case of any one of the a plumbing: no exuberance flagrancy of mendacity mendacious matter to no quantity of irrelevant matter is any which a limitation so much as professed to be applied

12 Of the instrument whatever its length copy upon copy made necessary

Then again of this learned instrument same document be the length of it what it will then must be copy upon copy: and of these copies one must or be entered (§ 41) with the Registrar in the book of "the Court" (namely the Court of the Judge in Ordinary) found in charge "before the Commission day," namely the day of the date of the Commission in virtue of which the Judges of Assize have to sit. But this same entry into this same book of the Registrar how is it to be effective? Will he thus deal by it without knowing what it is? For the he knowing what it is is there any way other than his having read it or heard it read? and for the performance of this best — where is what is to be his inducement: his inducement in the instance of so much as a single one of these "Notices,": much more less in the instance of the




Identifier: | JB/004/166/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-07-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-12

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

166

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c7 / c4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

2087

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in