★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/031/067/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1828 <sic>Sept.</sic> 18<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>§.2. <add>Universal</add> Jurisprudence</note><lb/>(3) <note>Conclusion<lb/>Language alone universal</note></p> <p><note>Pay an Astrologer — he will<lb/>tell what will happen to<lb/>you — Pay a Common Lawyer<lb/>he will tell what his Goddess<lb/>has determined. Astrologer<lb/>produces Stars, Lawyers can<lb/>not produce Goddess — talk | <head>1828 <sic>Sept.</sic> 18<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>§.2. <add>Universal</add> Jurisprudence</note><lb/>(3) <note>Conclusion<lb/>Language alone universal</note></p> <p><note>Pay an Astrologer — he will<lb/>tell what will happen to<lb/>you — Pay a Common Lawyer<lb/>he will tell what his Goddess<lb/>has determined. Astrologer<lb/>produces Stars, Lawyers can<lb/>not produce Goddess — talk<lb/>of substituting real for his<lb/>Sham Law — he is frantic</note></p> <p><note>Astrologer modest — compared<lb/>to Anti Codifiers</note></p> <p>Ask an Astrologer — paying him at the same time<lb/>for his answers — he will tell you, what will happen to you<lb/>in a twenty years henceforward, he will tell you what the<lb/>stars have determined. Ask. Common Lawyers — not forgetting<lb/>the like tale of respect and confidence, he will tell you<lb/>what the Goddess <add>of his Idolatry to the Goddess whom</add> he serves — and assuredly and for nought<lb/>has in relation to what you ask him about, determined.<lb/>The Astrologer is able to produce his stars: for <del><gap/></del> <add>the</add> stars<lb/>you see are his, he points to them and says with unquestionable<lb/>truth says there they are. The Common Lawyer<lb/>is not able to produce his Goddess: no one ever will be<lb/>Yet still he says Thus <sic>saith</sic> the Common Law. <del>and<lb/>propo</del> Tell him then this is but sham law, and propose to <del><gap/></del><lb/>him to substitute to it the only real law; he becomes<lb/>frantic; and instead of a rational answer, tells every<lb/>body that will have been that you are in <gap/>,<lb/>and that to establish real law would be to <unclear>subvert</unclear><lb/>all law. But by it, yes: provided always that the process<lb/>state now be at and end. But <gap/> of establishing the<lb/>entire <sic>fabrick</sic>, and all at once; then it is that establishment<lb/>and subversion are the same process <add>thing</add></p> <p>So comparison of the Anti-Codifying Common Layer<lb/>what a modest man <add>how modest a man</add> is the Astrologer!</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} | ||
1828 Sept. 18
Blackstone
§.2. Universal Jurisprudence
(3) Conclusion
Language alone universal
Pay an Astrologer — he will
tell what will happen to
you — Pay a Common Lawyer
he will tell what his Goddess
has determined. Astrologer
produces Stars, Lawyers can
not produce Goddess — talk
of substituting real for his
Sham Law — he is frantic
Astrologer modest — compared
to Anti Codifiers
Ask an Astrologer — paying him at the same time
for his answers — he will tell you, what will happen to you
in a twenty years henceforward, he will tell you what the
stars have determined. Ask. Common Lawyers — not forgetting
the like tale of respect and confidence, he will tell you
what the Goddess of his Idolatry to the Goddess whom he serves — and assuredly and for nought
has in relation to what you ask him about, determined.
The Astrologer is able to produce his stars: for the stars
you see are his, he points to them and says with unquestionable
truth says there they are. The Common Lawyer
is not able to produce his Goddess: no one ever will be
Yet still he says Thus saith the Common Law. and
propo Tell him then this is but sham law, and propose to
him to substitute to it the only real law; he becomes
frantic; and instead of a rational answer, tells every
body that will have been that you are in ,
and that to establish real law would be to subvert
all law. But by it, yes: provided always that the process
state now be at and end. But of establishing the
entire fabrick, and all at once; then it is that establishment
and subversion are the same process thing
So comparison of the Anti-Codifying Common Layer
what a modest man how modest a man is the Astrologer!
|
Identifier: | JB/031/067/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-09-18 |
not numbered |
||
|
031 |
civil code |
||
|
067 |
blackstone |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
9753 |
|||
