JB/031/077/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/031/077/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1828 July 24</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>3<lb/>Blackstone fainthearted <note><sic>Introd.</sic></note><lb/>(3</p> <p>One <gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/> this occasion in nature there is<lb/>which it is absolutely necessary should be given and attended<lb/>to.  This is that throughout perfect correctness <add>a <gap/> altogether free from incorrectness</add> is in the very<lb/>nature of the case absolutely impossible.  Suppose for example<lb/>a rule <add>position</add> which in the main is true, but <del><gap/></del> no otherwise<lb/>is their subject to certain exception: and that <del>this<lb?>the space necessary</del> for the statement of these exceptions a quantity of space is necessary not less than the utmost which can<lb/>be allotted for the whole of the present sketch.  Even though this<lb/>supposition is not in strictness realised, yet a state of change<lb/>sufficiently resembling it for the purpose of argument <del><add>will be</add> is unquestionably<lb/><gap/> will be found</del> <add>would upon</add> examination be found unquestionably<lb/>to have place.</p> <p>Moreover, <add>what happens almost continually is &#x2014; that against</add> that which in the present sketch must<lb/>either be passed by altogether, or mentioned simply as if<lb/>not <del>to</del> open to dispute, <del><gap/></del> objection and objections<lb/>may be raised, and thus <del><gap/></del> by every objection <sic>shewn</sic> to<lb/>be open to dispute.  This will in a more particular degree<lb/>the case with every position <del><gap/></del> which for its ground or warrant<lb?>has no other sort of law than that which in contradistinction<lb/>to statute is indeed Common law.  For <add>this same</add> Common Law not<lb/>having in any part of its extent any determinative forms<lb/>of words belonging to it, not any one man or set of men<lb/>who so much as pretend to have made it, <gap/> it is that<lb/><del><gap/> <gap/></del> of <add>in</add> <gap/> <gap/> of law scarcely can any one<lb/>practice be found that is not open to dispute.</p> <p>Under these <del><gap/></del> circumstances what is evident is &#x2014;<lb/>that only for the general <add>outline and</add> spirit is <gap/> of the description <add>picture</add><lb/>be given <add>drawn</add> can the author of such a sketch be with any<lb/><del><gap/></del> propriety be <del><gap/></del> considered as responsible: only<lb/>when <add><gap/> so far as</add> from any errors he <add>it</add> may have fallen into.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 11:26, 13 March 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 July 24

3
Blackstone fainthearted Introd.
(3

One this occasion in nature there is
which it is absolutely necessary should be given and attended
to. This is that throughout perfect correctness a altogether free from incorrectness is in the very
nature of the case absolutely impossible. Suppose for example
a rule position which in the main is true, but no otherwise
is their subject to certain exception: and that this<lb?>the space necessary for the statement of these exceptions a quantity of space is necessary not less than the utmost which can
be allotted for the whole of the present sketch. Even though this
supposition is not in strictness realised, yet a state of change
sufficiently resembling it for the purpose of argument will be is unquestionably
will be found
would upon examination be found unquestionably
to have place.

Moreover, what happens almost continually is — that against that which in the present sketch must
either be passed by altogether, or mentioned simply as if
not to open to dispute, objection and objections
may be raised, and thus by every objection shewn to
be open to dispute. This will in a more particular degree
the case with every position which for its ground or warrant<lb?>has no other sort of law than that which in contradistinction
to statute is indeed Common law. For this same Common Law not
having in any part of its extent any determinative forms
of words belonging to it, not any one man or set of men
who so much as pretend to have made it, it is that
of in of law scarcely can any one
practice be found that is not open to dispute.

Under these circumstances what is evident is —
that only for the general outline and spirit is of the description picture
be given drawn can the author of such a sketch be with any
propriety be considered as responsible: only
when so far as from any errors he it may have fallen into.



Identifier: | JB/031/077/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.

Date_1

1828-07-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

031

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

077

Info in main headings field

blackstone familiarized

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

9763

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in