★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/031/080/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1828 July 24</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><sic>Jud.</sic> <note>Preface?</note><lb/>(3) (1) <note><gap/> — Nullity &c</note></p> <p>A circumstance that <add>What</add> rendered these established delays<lb | <head>1828 July 24</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><sic>Jud.</sic> <note>Preface?</note><lb/>(3) (1) <note><gap/> — <unclear>Nullity</unclear> &c</note></p> <p>A circumstance that <add>What</add> rendered these established delays<lb/>the more adverse to justice was — that if any <add>one</add> of the written<lb/>pleadings or other instruments there was any thing that was<lb/>contrary to <hi rend="underline">rule</hi>, what had been done went for nothing: the consequence<lb/>was, that in some cases <hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]1</hi> the whole business had<lb/>to be done over again</note> <add>one</add> half <add>of</add> a year at least — in some<lb/>cases two, three or four half years <del>were</del> <add>being thus</add> lost, in other cases<lb/>it <del>could not</del> <add>was not supposed to</add> be done over again, but the service <add>demanded</add> which<lb/>was the object of the demand, howsoever important to justice<lb/>and public security was definitively denied. <hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi> The cases in which<lb/>the business might be<lb/>done over again were<lb/><add>cases called <hi rend="underline">civil</hi> cases</add><lb/>cases between individual<lb/>and individual:<lb/>the cases in which it<lb/>could not be done over<lb/>again were cases <del>between</del> <add>called<lb/>criminal cases — case between</add><lb/>the public and <add>an</add> individual;<lb/>and, among them, <add>are</add> murder<lb/>and other the most atrocious<lb/>crimes</note></p> <p>If the rule had been <add>previously</add> laid down — laid down in a determinate<lb/>form of words, as in <del>all</del> an Act of Parliament, this<lb/>would have been bad enough: because, <del>an Attorney</del> by contravention<lb/>of one of these rules, <del>an</del> <add> a Plaintiff's</add> Attorney <del><gap/></del> or a Clerk<lb/>of his, might <del>b</del> in a civil case <del>either double his own</del><lb/>by <del><del>depr</del> cheating his client either double his own profits<lb/>or <del>cheat</del> <add>deprive</add> him definitively of his remedy: and in a <del>civil</del><lb/>criminal case, produce the effect of a pardon and give impunity<lb/>to the most atrocious guilt.</p> <p>☞ Here <add>or further on</add> give the case of the man who cut his child's head off</p> <p>But what makes the matter so much worse is —<lb/>that in none of these cases has any such rule ever been<lb/>previously laid down: the individual or the public as<lb/>the case may be are deprived of the remedy, because another<lb/>person who <del>always</del> has it in his power to derive a<lb/>profit from the contravention is deemed to have <del>contravened</del> <add>acted in</add><lb/>contravention of a rule altogether imaginary — a rule which<lb/>so far from having been communicated to him had <add>been</add> never<lb/>been made : but which for the purpose of <del>producing</del> giving<lb/>birth to this effect, <add>supposed and feigned to</add> was falsely <sic>prehended</sic> to have been made.</p> <p> In Blackstone we are <del>gravely</del> informed with <del>great</del> <add>perfect</add> gravity<lb/>and without hesitation or exception that the power of pardon is<lb/>lodged solely in the King: and of <del>the importance of</del> <add>to</add> the power great<lb/>is the importance which with unquestionable truth is ascribed: while<lb/>in fact, this same power is <add>not only</add> possessed by every Attorney's Clerk, but<lb/>exercised by the Clerk in a more simple manner than by the King: <!-- continues in the margin and along the edge of the page --> for upon the pardon<lb/>when granted by the King there<lb/>is a tax of 40<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> and no such tax upon the pardon granted by the Clerk.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
1828 July 24
Jud. Preface?
(3) (1) — Nullity &c
A circumstance that What rendered these established delays
the more adverse to justice was — that if any one of the written
pleadings or other instruments there was any thing that was
contrary to rule, what had been done went for nothing: the consequence
was, that in some cases [+]1 [+]1 the whole business had
to be done over again one half of a year at least — in some
cases two, three or four half years were being thus lost, in other cases
it could not was not supposed to be done over again, but the service demanded which
was the object of the demand, howsoever important to justice
and public security was definitively denied. [+]2 [+]2 The cases in which
the business might be
done over again were
cases called civil cases
cases between individual
and individual:
the cases in which it
could not be done over
again were cases between called
criminal cases — case between
the public and an individual;
and, among them, are murder
and other the most atrocious
crimes
If the rule had been previously laid down — laid down in a determinate
form of words, as in all an Act of Parliament, this
would have been bad enough: because, an Attorney by contravention
of one of these rules, an a Plaintiff's Attorney or a Clerk
of his, might b in a civil case either double his own
by depr cheating his client either double his own profits
or cheat deprive him definitively of his remedy: and in a civil
criminal case, produce the effect of a pardon and give impunity
to the most atrocious guilt.
☞ Here or further on give the case of the man who cut his child's head off
But what makes the matter so much worse is —
that in none of these cases has any such rule ever been
previously laid down: the individual or the public as
the case may be are deprived of the remedy, because another
person who always has it in his power to derive a
profit from the contravention is deemed to have contravened acted in
contravention of a rule altogether imaginary — a rule which
so far from having been communicated to him had been never
been made : but which for the purpose of producing giving
birth to this effect, supposed and feigned to was falsely prehended to have been made.
In Blackstone we are gravely informed with great perfect gravity
and without hesitation or exception that the power of pardon is
lodged solely in the King: and of the importance of to the power great
is the importance which with unquestionable truth is ascribed: while
in fact, this same power is not only possessed by every Attorney's Clerk, but
exercised by the Clerk in a more simple manner than by the King: for upon the pardon
when granted by the King there
is a tax of 40s and no such tax upon the pardon granted by the Clerk.
Identifier: | JB/031/080/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1828-07-24 |
|||
031 |
civil code |
||
080 |
jud. |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c3 / c1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
9766 |
|||