★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1823. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r<hi rend="underline">..</hi></hi> 19</p> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> <add>or Procedure</add> <del>1. Enactive Part</del><add>Ratiocinate</add><lb/> | |||
<note>Ch. Quasi-Jury<lb/> | |||
1. App<gap/> function<lb/> | |||
§.</note><lb/> | |||
<p>III. Rationale. Quasi-jury part.</p> | |||
<p>Question Why are the cases of Judicial-rapacity officers admitt<lb/> | |||
of Appeal?</p> | |||
<p>Question Why not admitt of Appeal without a warrant<lb/> | |||
from a Quasi Jury?</p> | |||
<p>To <del>these two</del> questions this <gap/> connected, in <del><gap/></del> <lb/> | |||
separate answer can <gap/> to give.</p> | |||
<p>Reasons</p> | |||
<p>1. Appeal is eventually allowed, best if to a single Judge without<lb/> | |||
any presumptively <unclear>contracting</unclear> Jury the piece of aflicting punishment to such a extent <gap/> price, the security against <unclear>endeavour</unclear><lb/> | |||
and <del><gap/></del> oppression should <gap/> be regarded as not<add>insufficient</add> sufficiently<lb/> | |||
strong.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1823. Octr<hi rend="underline">..</hi> 19
Constitutional Code. or Procedure 1. Enactive PartRatiocinate
Ch. Quasi-Jury
1. App function
§.
III. Rationale. Quasi-jury part.
Question Why are the cases of Judicial-rapacity officers admitt
of Appeal?
Question Why not admitt of Appeal without a warrant
from a Quasi Jury?
To these two questions this connected, in
separate answer can to give.
Reasons
1. Appeal is eventually allowed, best if to a single Judge without
any presumptively contracting Jury the piece of aflicting punishment to such a extent price, the security against endeavour
and oppression should be regarded as notinsufficient sufficiently
strong.
Identifier: | JB/034/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1823-10-19 |
|||
034 |
constitutional code |
||
194 |
constitutional code procedures ratiocinative part |
||
001 |
rationale - quasi jury part |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
10468 |
|||