JB/004/072/003

Click Here To Edit

1830 July 4
J.B. v H.B. on Local Judicatory Rudiments

Peel and Brougham Coalition

We are It looks as if
that the two illustrious
theorists have little agrees
in some things, how
concurrent in this
are they amongst others
namely in the
if a party of their
theories from this mysterious
source

What changes might
not be rung upon
two such brilliant

What if instead of the
12 a hundred men
were to be put into the
wonder-working box?

What if the 12 men
were to be set to eat
dinner, in the five great
lakes

Set down all of
them during the 100
days at the Hight
Table — the Banker's
Table, where in every
body knows there is
such good living,
set down, like chickens
in a coop, to fatten

Viatrix causa Dies
placiunt, sid victor
Catoris

For Broughams profession
of attachment to Sir R
see the quotation from him
in Wellesley v Pettipages

---page break---

H.B. to J.B.s Challenge

Bs legislation

The challenge sent by
the one of these two extraordinary
friends to the
other is with — and
he this other — shrinks
from it

The incorruptible Lawyer
disdained predominate not to step
from his throne, this to
invite to combat
in the field area of Law-Reform
the mercenary
Advocate

But for in such a
combat neither fees
were to be gathered
nor a Bench climbed
up to and later possessed
of:
So the Lawyer has
sufficient Judgment to
go by Default is sent

The Westminster Review
Office is the Court
in which
this judgment
is entered upon!!

Peel and Brougham's Coalition

Under the absolute
wisdom of the perfection
of reason, every suit
commences with imposing
a fine to what
there are in hands
upon the party
have some so were his
imposing
and this what

and Mr
Brougham

determination be retained

---page break---

Brougham's R

Brougham & Honour
combining — per Birkbeck
Mill,
as per his speech
in London University
meeting 3 July 1830
Morn Chron 5 July

Broughams Qualifications

Broughams accusing
Peel of clap-trap
Clodius', inaction
Twelve-men-in a
box — and Antib
clap-traps

He understands
making expressions
when he
finds expressible
maters: such as
Sir Robt and Sir
B
afford so copious
a supply for of
but having
it in no small
quantity of his
view — he understands
no less well how to
expose himself.

No less in attempt
at suicide than at
homicide.

Advocates neither fit
for Judges nor for
Legislation

---page break---

Broughams Qualifications

For declamation, yes,
and self-laudation
for legislation, no: in
seder alter crepidum
declamatia reliquiry
with legislation, yes:
but it does not square
with it. Legislation and
declamation agree about
as well together, as
according to the
Post liberty and lies
For a
procession in the field
legislation not ill
suited to each other
are the Honble and
Learned Gentleman
and his Right Honble
collaborator the new
Baronet: not ill
suited to the walking
in that procession side
by side if not arm
in arm, like
smelling at the same
nosegay like the two
Kings of Brentford
if Rehearsal necessary.
What if they had a
little sparring t'other
day? So had
Signor Niodin, and
the lion whom he slew
in ceremony, as the
Spell (Baldwin's
not Lin) had
it? this shall not hinder
their smoaking a
social paper in the most
perfect good humour.
And that Henry Brougham
whatever also he is, is the
very of quintessence
of good humour is what "nobody can deny, deny: what nobody can deny."

Identifier: | JB/004/072/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.
Date_1	1830-07-04	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	004	Main Headings	lord brougham displayed
Folio number	072	Info in main headings field	jb v hb on local judicatory rudiments
Image	003	Titles	p. & br.'s coalition / county court plan / brougham's purpose / brougham's qualifications
Category	rudiments sheet (brouillon)	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	b&m 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public		ID Number	1993
Box Contents