JB/072/176/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/176/003: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


<head><add>19)</add> Personal Injuries .</head><!-- left aligned -->
<head><add>19)</add> Personal Injuries .</head><!-- left aligned -->
<p><note>Disablement temporary - Exemptive circumstances .</note>  Disablement and Disfigurement <del>m</del> it has been observed
<p><note>Disablement temporary - Exemptive circumstances.</note>  Disablement and Disfigurement <del>m</del> it has been observed
<lb/>
<lb/>
may either of them be temporary as well as
may either of them be temporary as well as
<lb/>
<lb/>
perpetual .  Mutilation from the nature of it cannot
perpetual.  Mutilation from the nature of it cannot
<lb/>
<lb/>
but be perpetual .
but be perpetual.
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


<p><add>With respect to</add> Disfigurement when voluntary <add><del>can</del></add> <del><sic>admitt</sic> <unclear><gap/></unclear> only of -
<p><add>With respect to</add> Disfigurement when voluntary <add><del>can</del></add> <del><sic>admitt</sic> only of -
<lb/>
<lb/>
<gap/></del> no other circumstances can operate <add>have the effect</add> as <unclear>exemptive</unclear><!-- or, 'exemption' ?-->
<gap/></del> no other circumstances can operate <add>have the effect</add> as <unclear>exemptive</unclear>
<lb/>
<lb/>
circumstances than what would operate with respect
circumstances than what would operate with respect
<lb/>
<lb/>
to it if it were perpetual .
to it if it were perpetual.
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


<p><!-- indent -->With respect to Disablement it is otherwise .  There
<p><!-- indent -->With respect to Disablement it is otherwise.  There
<lb/>
<lb/>
are many [cases] sets of circumstances in which either
are many [cases] sets of circumstances in which either
Line 39: Line 39:
situations <del>of</del> <add>or</add> sufferings of the party hurt . But it must not
situations <del>of</del> <add>or</add> sufferings of the party hurt . But it must not
<lb/>
<lb/>
appear that they were motives to the act .  If other were
appear that they were motives to the act.  If other were
<lb/>
<lb/>
so , the hurt <add>mischief</add> would be said to have been done <hi rend='underline'>in malice</hi> .
so , the hurt <add>mischief</add> would be said to have been done <hi rend='underline'>in malice</hi>.
<lb/>
<lb/>
But this will not appear to have been the case when
But this will not appear to have been the case when
Line 53: Line 53:
in the <add>those</add> circumstances in question to give birth to the act  
in the <add>those</add> circumstances in question to give birth to the act  
<lb/>
<lb/>
in question .
in question.
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


Line 60: Line 60:
pain or to produce <add>a temporary</add> disablement <add>is</add> when the motive was
pain or to produce <add>a temporary</add> disablement <add>is</add> when the motive was
<lb/>
<lb/>
[self-defence &#x2014;] self-preservation .
[self-defence &#x2014;] self-preservation.
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>



Revision as of 14:47, 13 January 2012

Click Here To Edit


19) Personal Injuries .

Disablement temporary - Exemptive circumstances. Disablement and Disfigurement m it has been observed
may either of them be temporary as well as
perpetual. Mutilation from the nature of it cannot
but be perpetual.

With respect to Disfigurement when voluntary can admitt only of -
no other circumstances can operate have the effect as exemptive
circumstances than what would operate with respect
to it if it were perpetual.

With respect to Disablement it is otherwise. There
are many [cases] sets of circumstances in which either
the disablement of the party or her suffering a certain portion of organised
pain may with reason be permitted. But all these
cases neither the such pain nor such disablement
is among the motives to the act. They may be either
of them the ultimate object many of them objects of the intention which are
situations of or sufferings of the party hurt . But it must not
appear that they were motives to the act. If other were
so , the hurt mischief would be said to have been done in malice.
But this will not appear to have been the case when
the circumstances are such as point out any other
motive as being of the number of those [from which the
act was capable of originating.] which were of a nature
in the those circumstances in question to give birth to the act
in question.

In the first place One case in which the intent may have been to inflict
pain or to produce a temporary disablement is when the motive was
[self-defence —] self-preservation.

Defence implies an attack



Identifier: | JB/072/176/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

176

Info in main headings field

personal injuries - aggrav.

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e17 / e18 / e19 / e20

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23793

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in