JB/004/225/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/004/225/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/225/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/225/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>Now then <del>what <gap/></del> <add>how is this managed by</add> our learned draughtsman?  Occasions,<lb/>
on which mention of an Oath is made
</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 
 
<p>1830. Aug. 27<lb/>
<head>Review</head><note><del>IX.</del> <add>VIII</add> Nomography<lb/>
2  Inconsistence.</note></p>
<p>Taught by <gap/>, we could the</p>
<p>3.  Needless diffusiveness and inconsistency <add>and <gap/></add> combined.<lb/>
When a string of specific articles is <add>come</add> brought upon the carpet,<lb/>
capable of being included all together under one generic<lb/>
appellation – give <add>exhibit</add> the generic appellation in the first instance<lb/>
speak of the specific article as being included in that <unclear>genus</unclear><lb/>
either as constituting <add>composing</add> the whole matter of it, or as being <add>presenting</add> so<lb/>
many examples of it:  do this once for all – <gap/> <gap/> the<lb/>
grant in <gap/> with the string of specific article, but imply<lb/>
throughout the generic denomination in the <unclear>room</unclear> of it.  This is<lb/>
one of Bentham's Rules.  By this means not only useless diffusiveness<lb/>
but inconsistency and incomplete provisions are avoided.</p>
<p>Now as to this matter, note <add>see observe</add> what Brougham does, and<lb/>
note the consequence.<lb/>
&#9758; This rule does not <add>exactly</add> fit what follows.</p>
<p><del><add><gap/></add> Decisions in which power <add>is given</add> to the Judge to administer an<lb/>
Oath.  <add>To</add> No such <unclear>mischievous</unclear> ceremony would Bentham have<lb/>
given any employment at all:  but this in a parenthesis.  Without<lb/>
power to <gap/> for warrant, the requisite security, what<lb/>
would this or any other Judge be?  What has now been <gap/><lb/>
would be:  nothing more.</del>  But if to this same Judge words in express<lb/>
form for the <del><gap/></del> clothes him with power were necessary<lb/>
what use or what demand for enactments more than one.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 03:54, 11 May 2024

Click Here To Edit

Now then what how is this managed by our learned draughtsman? Occasions,
on which mention of an Oath is made



1830. Aug. 27
ReviewIX. VIII Nomography
2 Inconsistence.

Taught by , we could the

3. Needless diffusiveness and inconsistency and combined.
When a string of specific articles is come brought upon the carpet,
capable of being included all together under one generic
appellation – give exhibit the generic appellation in the first instance
speak of the specific article as being included in that genus
either as constituting composing the whole matter of it, or as being presenting so
many examples of it: do this once for all – the
grant in with the string of specific article, but imply
throughout the generic denomination in the room of it. This is
one of Bentham's Rules. By this means not only useless diffusiveness
but inconsistency and incomplete provisions are avoided.

Now as to this matter, note see observe what Brougham does, and
note the consequence.
☞ This rule does not exactly fit what follows.

Decisions in which power is given to the Judge to administer an
Oath. To No such mischievous ceremony would Bentham have
given any employment at all: but this in a parenthesis. Without
power to for warrant, the requisite security, what
would this or any other Judge be? What has now been
would be: nothing more.
But if to this same Judge words in express
form for the clothes him with power were necessary
what use or what demand for enactments more than one.




Identifier: | JB/004/225/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-08-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

225

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / c6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1828

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

2146

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in