★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1830. July 28 M | <head>1830. July 28 M<lb/> | ||
Review. | Review.</head> | ||
<gap/> | <note><del><gap/></del><lb/> | ||
Reinquire | Reinquire<lb/> | ||
or | or<lb/> | ||
Removal | Removal<lb/> | ||
3. Legacia | 3. Legacia</note> | ||
Now for reinquiria | <p>Now for reinquiria</p> | ||
Here come flow in — a cluster of them | <p>Here come <add>flow in</add> — a cluster of them</p> | ||
1 | <note>1<lb/> | ||
As to each of the several | As to each of the several<lb/> | ||
matters of fact in dispute | matters of fact in dispute<lb/> | ||
after the chaos of special | after the chaos of special<lb/> | ||
pleading the Judge has | pleading the Judge has<lb/> | ||
authority to send it to | authority to send it to<lb/> | ||
a Jury | a Jury</note> | ||
§ So | <p>§ So Of the "matters of fact" capable of being brought into<lb/> | ||
"dispute between the parties" a specimen has <gap/> herein | "dispute between the parties" a specimen has <del><gap/></del> herein<lb/> | ||
above been brought to view. Now after the chaos | above been brought to view. Now after the <unclear>chaos</unclear><lb/> | ||
of special pleading upon our learned draughtsman speck | of special pleading upon our learned draughtsman <unclear>speck<lb/> | ||
and spic and plan, by "< | and spic and plan</unclear>, by "<unclear>estation</unclear>," and "article," and<lb/> | ||
what not, has been carried on to a sufficient length | what not, has been carried on to a sufficient length<lb/> | ||
suppose a fancy taken by the | suppose a fancy taken by the Judges to see what would <add>will</add><lb/> | ||
be said to them by a few sets of twelve men put | be said to them by a few sets of twelve men put respectively<lb/> | ||
into so many boxes, after hearing the requisite<lb/> | |||
declamations | declamations our style as near as may be to our learned<lb/> | ||
draughtsman's incomparable style, has at least on each | draughtsman's incomparable style, has at least on each<lb/> | ||
side? In this same | side? In this same §.70 to look further, his Worship<lb/> | ||
or Honour or Lordship in Ordinary will find authority for | or Honour or Lordship in Ordinary will find authority for<lb/> | ||
so doing to his hearts content | so doing to his hearts <unclear>content</unclear></p> | ||
2 | <note>2<lb/> | ||
In this case Reinquiry | In this case Reinquiry<lb/> | ||
the first to determine | the first to determine<lb/> | ||
whether Reinquiry the | whether Reinquiry the<lb/> | ||
2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> being the said Jury<lb/> | |||
trial shall have place | trial shall have place</note> | ||
Then In this case in the instance relation to each such mater of fact comes Reinquiry the second first, having for it the object | <p><del>Then</del> <add>In this case in the instance</add> <add>relation</add> <add>to each such mater of fact</add> comes Reinquiry the <del>second</del> first, <add>having for it</add> the object<lb/> | ||
of it to determine whether Reinquiry the second, namely | of it to determine whether Reinquiry the second, namely<lb/> | ||
the aforesaid Jury-trial as aforesaid: Reinquiry the | the aforesaid Jury-trial as aforesaid: Reinquiry the<lb/> | ||
first being by Motion, <gap/> stuffed with < | first being by Motion, <del><gap/></del> stuffed with Affidavit work<lb/> | ||
in this as in all other cases. But every instance | in this as in all other cases. But every instance<lb/> | ||
of Jury trial will be found to suppose the existence of a | of Jury trial will be found to suppose the existence of a<lb/> | ||
Motion for New trial, and in one of the two events, New | Motion for New trial, and in one of the two events, New<lb/> | ||
trial accordingly: then from those dates in regard to each | trial accordingly: then <add>from those dates</add> in regard to each<lb/> | ||
such disputable matter of fact, instituting in the first place | such disputable matter of fact, instituting <add>in regard to each</add> in the first place<lb/> | ||
< | <unclear>the two</unclear> enquiries included in the original <del><gap/></del> Jury trial<lb/> | ||
as above, and < | as above, and <unclear>then</unclear> adding <del><gap/></del> these two the two New Trial<lb/> | ||
< | <unclear>enquiries</unclear> we should have 4. This number 4 will then <add>thereupon</add><lb/> | ||
< | <unclear>have</unclear> to be <del><gap/></del> multiplied by the number of the above-<lb/> | ||
mentioned disputable matters of fact, for which it being | mentioned disputable matters of fact, for which it being<lb/> | ||
<gap/> put <gap/>: | <gap/> put <del><gap/></del>:<lb/> | ||
or | <add>or</add></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1830. July 28 M
Review.
Reinquire
or
Removal
3. Legacia
Now for reinquiria
Here come flow in — a cluster of them
1
As to each of the several
matters of fact in dispute
after the chaos of special
pleading the Judge has
authority to send it to
a Jury
§ So Of the "matters of fact" capable of being brought into
"dispute between the parties" a specimen has herein
above been brought to view. Now after the chaos
of special pleading upon our learned draughtsman speck
and spic and plan, by "estation," and "article," and
what not, has been carried on to a sufficient length
suppose a fancy taken by the Judges to see what would will
be said to them by a few sets of twelve men put respectively
into so many boxes, after hearing the requisite
declamations our style as near as may be to our learned
draughtsman's incomparable style, has at least on each
side? In this same §.70 to look further, his Worship
or Honour or Lordship in Ordinary will find authority for
so doing to his hearts content
2
In this case Reinquiry
the first to determine
whether Reinquiry the
2d being the said Jury
trial shall have place
Then In this case in the instance relation to each such mater of fact comes Reinquiry the second first, having for it the object
of it to determine whether Reinquiry the second, namely
the aforesaid Jury-trial as aforesaid: Reinquiry the
first being by Motion, stuffed with Affidavit work
in this as in all other cases. But every instance
of Jury trial will be found to suppose the existence of a
Motion for New trial, and in one of the two events, New
trial accordingly: then from those dates in regard to each
such disputable matter of fact, instituting in regard to each in the first place
the two enquiries included in the original Jury trial
as above, and then adding these two the two New Trial
enquiries we should have 4. This number 4 will then thereupon
have to be multiplied by the number of the above-
mentioned disputable matters of fact, for which it being
put :
or
|
Identifier: | JB/004/178/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-07-28 |
1-2 |
||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
178 |
review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c6 / c1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
2099 |
|||
