JB/002/286/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/286/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




under construction ...
under construction by Diane Folan ... please do not amend!




Line 58: Line 58:
<p>On the supposition , the price to be paid for <del>the reduction
<p>On the supposition , the price to be paid for <del>the reduction
<lb/>
<lb/>
of</del> a consent to the <gap/> of <add>a mass of perpetual Annuities to the <add>above</add> amount of</add> <del>the above mass of a
of</del> a consent to the <gap/> of <add>a mass of perpetual Annuities to the <add>above</add> amount of</add> <del>the above mass of a</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
£1,4<del>3</del>40,<del>000</del>259 a year , <del>in (Annuities</del> would be a little  
<!-- NB: I have left a space between the original numbers (which haven't subsequently been amended/overwritten, and those that were written over the original (as having '4s' both sides of the deleted numbers makes it difficult to read on the saved page, due the '4s' having a horizontal bar at the same point as the deleted text).  Amend as necessary -->£1,4 <del>3<unclear>5</unclear>,000</del> 40,259 a year , <del>in (Annuities</del> would be a little  
<lb/>
<lb/>
less than 4 times <hi rend='underline'>that</hi> sum : <add>&#x2014; it owuld be £5,406,713 : <add>(a)</add><!-- the '(a)' has been written over the mdash, and written in red, though I have written the '(a)' as inserted before the mdash, because the mdash hasn't been deleted as such -->&#x2014; <add>exactly four times would be</add><!-- added at the end of the sentence, and runs into the right margin --> <del>that or a little less than</del>
less than 4 times <hi rend='underline'>that</hi> sum : <add>&#x2014; it would be £5,406,713 : <add>(a)</add><!-- the '(a)' has been written over the mdash, and written in red, though I have written the '(a)' as inserted before the mdash, because the mdash hasn't been deleted as such -->&#x2014; <add>exactly four times would be</add><!-- added at the end of the sentence, and runs into the right margin --> <del>that or a little less than</del>
<lb/>
<lb/>
£5,744,000. <add></del>(a)<!-- '(a)' written in red --></del></add>  <add>though</add>
£5,744,000. <add><del>(a)<!-- '(a)' written in red --></del></add>  <add>though</add>
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


<!-- horizontal line -->
<!-- horizontal line -->
<pb/>
<pb/>
<head>Note (a) in and to p. 190</head><!-- starts at roughly the centre of the page, and written in red -->
<p>(a)<!-- '(a)' written in red --> <del>£2 £</del>  As £577,034 is to £2,166,178 , so is £1,440,259
<lb/>
to £5,406,713 .  <add>End of the Note</add><!-- addition in red -->
<lb/></p>





Revision as of 19:35, 14 January 2012

File:JB 002 286 001.jpg

ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE

under construction by Diane Folan ... please do not amend!


23 Sept - 1800 + 190 Annuity Notes Abstract

Ch XV. Pelham This £2,166,178 [thus paid for a consent to the reduction ]
amounts to a more than 1/27th of the amount of the
capital of £57,703,495 , upon which the reduction
of the 4 per Cent per annum to 3 per Cent was thus
effected : a little less than £2,300,136 which would be the exact amount of £2,308,136 = 4 years purchase + of the perpetual annuity thus struck off . Such
then is the prior given that , on Mr Pelham's plan , would
be to be given , for a consent , which upon the proposed
plan , would be obtained gratis .

On the proposed plan , the of interest that
would be struck off by the first reduction ; (viz: meaning the redirection
effected in the course of the two first Periods ,
by conversion of 4 and 5 and 3 per Cents and after some 3
per Cent
into Capitals bearing £2:19:0 per Cent)
by means of the paper of the first issue, would be +
£1,438,500 - (a) £1,440,250 - — — — — — £1,212,608
That , upon any proposed reduction , to be effected at
this time of day , the prins terms should be offered ,
as were offered at that time of day , would , under the
vast difference of circumstances be a supposition altogether
 : but , as it would be a fruitless attempt
to determine what would be the terms now offered ,
the only terms in which any argument can be grounded
are the above .

On the supposition , the price to be paid for the reduction
of
a consent to the of a mass of perpetual Annuities to the <add>above amount of</add> the above mass of a
£1,4 35,000 40,259 a year , in (Annuities would be a little
less than 4 times that sum : — it would be £5,406,713 : <add>(a)exactly four times would be that or a little less than
£5,744,000. (a) though


---page break---

Note (a) in and to p. 190

(a) £2 £ As £577,034 is to £2,166,178 , so is £1,440,259
to £5,406,713 . End of the Note


DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE

Identifier: | JB/002/286/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

1800-09-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

3

Box

002

Main Headings

Annuity Notes

Folio number

286

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Note (a) in and to p. 190

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F190

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

<…>M 1798

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Frances Wright

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

1025

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in