JB/550/112/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/550/112/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/550/112/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/550/112/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1826. <del>July</del> Aug. 2<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Penal <del>Constitutional</del> Code – Procedure</head><note>Ch. Jurisprudential Entities</note></p>
 
<p>Be this as it may – not to the plan here proposed would<lb/>
the imperfection of this part of the instrument of demand <add>with propriety</add> be justly<lb/>
<gap/>.  The root of the imperfection is in the very notion<lb/>
of the Common Law.  <add>To its supreme inaptitude</add> By the proposed instrument such remedy<lb/>
as the nature of the case admitted is applied, <gap/> the<lb/>
<gap/> case <add>this</add> mode of the Common Law is the result – not of <gap/><lb/>
of inevitable <add><unclear>unsurmountable</unclear></add> <gap/>.  How <gap/> inadequate a<lb/>
portion of this fictitious law is in the character of a <gap/><lb/>
to <del>an</del> a correspondent and equivalent portion of real law would<lb/>
on each occasion be visible to every eye – not as often as<lb/>
it <gap/> the eye so often would the urgency of the demand for the<lb/>
substitution of real to  <gap/> law be forced upon the mind <add>attention</add>.<lb/>
What would be in the power of the legislator to do at
</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 05:35, 25 July 2024

Click Here To Edit

1826. July Aug. 2
Penal Constitutional Code – ProcedureCh. Jurisprudential Entities

Be this as it may – not to the plan here proposed would
the imperfection of this part of the instrument of demand with propriety be justly
. The root of the imperfection is in the very notion
of the Common Law. To its supreme inaptitude By the proposed instrument such remedy
as the nature of the case admitted is applied, the
case this mode of the Common Law is the result – not of
of inevitable unsurmountable . How inadequate a
portion of this fictitious law is in the character of a
to an a correspondent and equivalent portion of real law would
on each occasion be visible to every eye – not as often as
it the eye so often would the urgency of the demand for the
substitution of real to law be forced upon the mind attention.
What would be in the power of the legislator to do at



Identifier: | JB/550/112/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 550.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

550

Main Headings

Folio number

112

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in