JB/549/330/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/549/330/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
flowing into existence; as by <gap/> it is flowing out  of <lb/>
flowing into existence; as by <gap/> it is flowing out  of <lb/>
existence.</p>
existence.</p>
1. Case the first. The matter of wealth <gap/>deed in a statuary state <note>divided in different propertiesamong so many <lb/>
<p>1. Case the first. The matter of wealth <gap/>deed in a statuary state <note>divided in different propertiesamong so many <lb/>
possessors<lb/>
possessors<lb/>
7.<lb/>  
7.<lb/>  
Case I Matter of wealth<lb/>
Case I Matter of wealth<lb/>
stationary</note><lb/>
stationary</note><lb/>
1. But for  
1. But for simplicity of <unclear>corruption</unclear> it may in the<lb/>
first place be considered in a <hi rend="underline"> stationary state</hi>: and as<lb/>
having, no matter by which means been <del><gap/></del> in various proportions <note>7<lb/>
Case I Matter of wealth<lb/>
stationary</note><lb/>
distributed among so many propo<gap/>, ca<gap/><lb/>
to each, in so far as depends upon external cause and<lb/>
circumstances, the means of happiness</p>
<note>8<lb/>
Hence the inequality<lb/>
minimizing principle<lb/>
of which antagonists are<lb/>
1 Abundance maximizing<lb/>
2 Security maximizing</note><lb/>
<p>Let us <gap/>, in what way the quality of<lb/>
happiness produce by <gap/> possession of the matters of wealth<lb/>
depends upon the quality of that sense matter possessed.</p>
<p>These results may stand expressed by the <gap/> follows</p>
<p><gap/> Now give the ax<gap/> from Di<gap/></p>
<p>From this observation follows what may be called the<lb/>
Inquality minimizing principle. Against it <unclear>anticipation of</unclear><lb/>
1. The Abundance - maximizing principle in The security<lb/>
maximizing principle. 2. The abundance maximizing principle</p>
<p>By these principles are regulated the principle of the act and<lb/>
<gap/> of <del>polit</del> political <gap/>aning, and the several legislation arrangement dictated by<lb/>
them - <gap/> constituted so many se<gap/> distinguished <gap/> of the Penal and Civil Codes.</p>
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 14:22, 4 August 2024

Click Here To Edit

1827. Octr.

Penal. Civil in Constitutional Code for Law Class Codification 1. Prop
Explanat and Axioms
S.20 Security for property &
Reasons for
6
III Security for property
reasons for giving

Property the source of subsisting and attendance = no distribution S. Offence collectively the subject matter
of equality and equal

S.2. Establishment of property and security for it.

Much more complex are the reasons for the giving
security are to property against misdeeds byof which the violation
of it is the it that is to say the violation or infringement of the rights by the establishment of which it is conferred,
it thea result

The maker of wealth is the fund of labour operating
origoriginally upon land, afterward upon the the product of labour
and land: and in so far for what it in this to
be producing the state it is may be stiled a state.
in so much as by the means of labour it is continually
flowing into existence; as by it is flowing out of
existence.

1. Case the first. The matter of wealth deed in a statuary state divided in different propertiesamong so many
possessors
7.
Case I Matter of wealth
stationary

1. But for simplicity of corruption it may in the
first place be considered in a stationary state: and as
having, no matter by which means been in various proportions 7
Case I Matter of wealth
stationary

distributed among so many propo, ca
to each, in so far as depends upon external cause and
circumstances, the means of happiness

8
Hence the inequality
minimizing principle
of which antagonists are
1 Abundance maximizing
2 Security maximizing

Let us , in what way the quality of
happiness produce by possession of the matters of wealth
depends upon the quality of that sense matter possessed.

These results may stand expressed by the follows

Now give the ax from Di

From this observation follows what may be called the
Inquality minimizing principle. Against it anticipation of
1. The Abundance - maximizing principle in The security
maximizing principle. 2. The abundance maximizing principle

By these principles are regulated the principle of the act and
of polit political aning, and the several legislation arrangement dictated by
them - constituted so many se distinguished of the Penal and Civil Codes.




Identifier: | JB/549/330/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549.

Date_1

1827-10-??

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-8

Box

549

Main Headings

Folio number

330

Info in main headings field

Penal Civil or Constitutional Code for Law Amendment.

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in