JB/072/197/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/197/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/197/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/197/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>26 C</head> <head>Paederasty<!-- ligature --></head>
 
<p>applies to <add>bestows on</add> the propensity under consideration the epithet<lb/> of unnatural. If contrary to all appearance the case<lb/> really were that if all men were left perfectly free<lb/> to choose, as many men would make choice of their<lb/> own sex as of the female <add>opposite one</add>, I see not what reason<lb/> there would be for applying the word <hi rend='underline'>natural</hi> to<lb/> the one rather than to the other. All the difference<lb/> would be that the one was both natural<lb/> and necessary, whereas the other was natural but<lb/> not necessary. If the mere circumstance of it's<lb/> not being necessary were sufficient to [exclude it from<lb/> all title to be called natural] warrant the terming<lb/> it unnatural, it might as well be said that the taste <add>a man has</add> for music is unnatural.</p>
<p>My wonder is how any man who is at all<lb/> acquainted with the most amiable part of the species<lb/> should ever entertain any serious apprehensions<lb/> of their yielding the ascendent to such unworthy rivals.</p>
<note><del>Whether</del> Among the ancients it excluded <add>not</add> the regular taste?</note><lb/>
A circumstance that contributes considerably<lb/> to the alarms entertained by some people on this<lb/> score is a notion <add>the common notion <add>prejudice</add></add> <add>which supposes</add> that the one propensity is exclusive<lb/> of the other. This notion is for the most part<lb/> founded on prejudice, as may be seen in the works <note>a multitude of <sic>antient</sic> authors</note> of the historians of antiquity in which <del>the</del> we continually<lb/> see the same person at one time stepping<lb/> aside in pursuit of this exotic <add>eccentric</add> kind of pleasure, but<lb/> at other times directing his inclination to the proper<lb/> object. Horace <note>in speaking of the means of <unclear>falsifying</unclear> the venereal appetite</note> proposes to himself [indifferently] as a <add>matter</add>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:32, 19 January 2012

Click Here To Edit

26 C Paederasty

applies to bestows on the propensity under consideration the epithet
of unnatural. If contrary to all appearance the case
really were that if all men were left perfectly free
to choose, as many men would make choice of their
own sex as of the female opposite one, I see not what reason
there would be for applying the word natural to
the one rather than to the other. All the difference
would be that the one was both natural
and necessary, whereas the other was natural but
not necessary. If the mere circumstance of it's
not being necessary were sufficient to [exclude it from
all title to be called natural] warrant the terming
it unnatural, it might as well be said that the taste a man has for music is unnatural.

My wonder is how any man who is at all
acquainted with the most amiable part of the species
should ever entertain any serious apprehensions
of their yielding the ascendent to such unworthy rivals.

Whether Among the ancients it excluded not the regular taste?
A circumstance that contributes considerably
to the alarms entertained by some people on this
score is a notion the common notion <add>prejudice</add> which supposes that the one propensity is exclusive
of the other. This notion is for the most part
founded on prejudice, as may be seen in the works a multitude of antient authors of the historians of antiquity in which the we continually
see the same person at one time stepping
aside in pursuit of this exotic eccentric kind of pleasure, but
at other times directing his inclination to the proper
object. Horace in speaking of the means of falsifying the venereal appetite proposes to himself [indifferently] as a matter



Identifier: | JB/072/197/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

197

Info in main headings field

paederasty

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25 / f26 / f27 / f28

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23814

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in