JB/055/058/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/055/058/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/055/058/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/058/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/058/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head></p>
 
<p>When it is really his intention, <del>as</del> <add>that</add> a check – the<lb/>
 
usual check, should be applied to lying, he applies it<lb/>
 
accordingly;  when the suit is once got into the hands<lb/>
of his brethren <add>fraternity</add>, he applies the check:  examining an extraneous<lb/>
witness he calls in a non penal case <hi rend="underline">enquête</hi>, in<lb/>
a penal case <hi rend="underline">instruction</hi>.  In a non penal case examining<lb/>
a party he calls <hi rend="underline">interrogation sur faits et articles</hi>.  This<lb/>
diversity so agreable to every eye that loves perplexity &amp;<lb/>
confusion he found in french law and has left in it.<lb/>
This interrogation he has the <del><gap/></del> generosity to declare<lb/>
may have place in any (<hi rend="underline">etat</hi>) stage of the cause:  but in<lb/>
the first place he has taken care – the care that has<lb/>
been seen – that the cause shall be safely lodged in the<lb/>
hands of those whose interest it is that operations should<lb/>
previously have been performed and instruments manufactured<lb/>
with the help of nullities for the production of<lb/>
more operations and more instruments, to as copious an<lb/>
amount as possible.  If under the check in question<lb/>
before any individual in the character of defendant<lb/>
had been plagued, the would-be pursuer had been admitted<lb/>
and obliged to state his case to an <unclear>unfeed</unclear> Judge, suits<lb/>
plainly groundless would as above have been nipt in the bud<lb/>
and where the nature of the case admitted of reconciliation,<lb/>
a door to reconciliation opened.</p>
<p>Of the sort of Court <add>Judicatory</add>, in the establishment of which<lb/>
the word Reconciliation or the equivalent of it, was first<lb/>
employed, the object was, to keep disputes between man &amp;<lb/>
man, in as large proportion as might be out of the hands<lb/>
of those whose interests<lb/>
&amp; consequently<lb/>
endeavour, it is to employ<lb/>
them as instruments<lb/>
for squeezing<lb/>
out of both as much<lb/>
money as possible:<lb/>
and in a certain<lb/>
proportion this was<lb/>
and is done.<lb/>
<add>If</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:35, 3 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823 Decr.
Constitutional Code

When it is really his intention, as that a check – the
usual check, should be applied to lying, he applies it
accordingly; when the suit is once got into the hands
of his brethren fraternity, he applies the check: examining an extraneous
witness he calls in a non penal case enquête, in
a penal case instruction. In a non penal case examining
a party he calls interrogation sur faits et articles. This
diversity so agreable to every eye that loves perplexity &
confusion he found in french law and has left in it.
This interrogation he has the generosity to declare
may have place in any (etat) stage of the cause: but in
the first place he has taken care – the care that has
been seen – that the cause shall be safely lodged in the
hands of those whose interest it is that operations should
previously have been performed and instruments manufactured
with the help of nullities for the production of
more operations and more instruments, to as copious an
amount as possible. If under the check in question
before any individual in the character of defendant
had been plagued, the would-be pursuer had been admitted
and obliged to state his case to an unfeed Judge, suits
plainly groundless would as above have been nipt in the bud
and where the nature of the case admitted of reconciliation,
a door to reconciliation opened.

Of the sort of Court Judicatory, in the establishment of which
the word Reconciliation or the equivalent of it, was first
employed, the object was, to keep disputes between man &
man, in as large proportion as might be out of the hands
of those whose interests
& consequently
endeavour, it is to employ
them as instruments
for squeezing
out of both as much
money as possible:
and in a certain
proportion this was
and is done.
If


Identifier: | JB/055/058/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1823-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

59 or 29 - 60 or 30

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

058

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C5 / D19

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1823

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1823

Notes public

ID Number

17779

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in