★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1830. July 29 M<lb/> | |||
Review.</head> | |||
<note>5. Conciliating<lb/> | |||
Reinquiries.</note> | |||
<note>1<lb/> | |||
Proof by one party of<lb/> | |||
the refusal of the other<lb/> | |||
party to appear in a<lb/> | |||
Court of Reconciliation</note> | |||
<p>§. 96. Reconcilement. <gap/> If and when a party has<lb/> | |||
asked as per §. 95, "he shall as his own election appears and<lb/> | |||
"not before the said Judge." Well, and suppose he does not appear<lb/> | |||
nor takes any notion of it what then? why then "he<lb/> | |||
"shall within one week of being so cited, serve the party so citing<lb/> | |||
<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <gap/><gap/><lb/> | |||
"with a notice, in which notice he shall stat3ewhether he intends to appear<lb/> | |||
"not." Well and suppose he does not perform such serving.<lb/> | |||
Service till after the writ is at and he does not <gap/> it all</p> | |||
<p>What then? Why then "such Notice may be given to with the proof of citation<lb/> | |||
"<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> in evidence against the party <gap/> in any such<lb/> | |||
"who have or in Equity which may be brought against the party<lb/> | |||
"citing for the purpose of proving that the party cited refused<lb/> | |||
"to appear before the Judge in Ordinary or a Court of Reconcilement."</p> | |||
<note>2<lb/> | |||
Nothing gained but<lb/> | |||
hearing himself laughed<lb/> | |||
at by lawyers</note> | |||
<p>Well, and what of that? why nothing. To <gap/> <gap/> any<lb/> | |||
such proof would cost him <gap/> something and nothing<lb/> | |||
would he get by it: saving not <gap/> employ the pleasure of hearing<lb/> | |||
and seeing himself laughed at by learned Gentlemen.</p> | |||
<note>3.<lb/> | |||
To Reconcilement both<lb/> | |||
parties are accessory if<lb/> | |||
one party refuses the<lb/> | |||
other cannot make<lb/> | |||
him be reconciled</note> | |||
<p>Now then as to the disp<gap/> of the two parties. Either<lb/> | |||
they are both of them disposed to reconcilement or they are not<lb/> | |||
if they are, nothing is then to hinder them: <gap/> <gap/> they may<lb/> | |||
<note>[ ] <gap/> than they are <gap/><lb/> | |||
the <gap/> for this judge</note><lb/> | |||
<gap/> it with the least possible trouble and without any expence<lb/> | |||
Now suppose one of them withes for reconcilement, the other not<lb/> | |||
what is the case <gap/> <gap/> either of them the better for the Judge. No<lb/> | |||
<gap/> could be his for having any thing to do with the<lb/> | |||
matter for any purpose better or other than the making more sense<lb/> | |||
if setting than together by the case. But suppose it was really <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
to being abuse or reconciliation what would be whose wish it were<lb/> | |||
to <gap/> be reconciled? what would the parties in either of<lb/> | |||
them be the better for <gap/> wish. To a reconcilement, as to<lb/> | |||
some other things, two parties are necessary: one of them the stuborn one will<lb/> | |||
not be reconciled: and as to the other <gap/> <gap/> his matter the<lb/> | |||
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> yet the Judge can make him be so.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1830. July 29 M
Review.
5. Conciliating
Reinquiries.
1
Proof by one party of
the refusal of the other
party to appear in a
Court of Reconciliation
§. 96. Reconcilement. If and when a party has
asked as per §. 95, "he shall as his own election appears and
"not before the said Judge." Well, and suppose he does not appear
nor takes any notion of it what then? why then "he
"shall within one week of being so cited, serve the party so citing
"with a notice, in which notice he shall stat3ewhether he intends to appear
"not." Well and suppose he does not perform such serving.
Service till after the writ is at and he does not it all
What then? Why then "such Notice may be given to with the proof of citation
" in evidence against the party in any such
"who have or in Equity which may be brought against the party
"citing for the purpose of proving that the party cited refused
"to appear before the Judge in Ordinary or a Court of Reconcilement."
2
Nothing gained but
hearing himself laughed
at by lawyers
Well, and what of that? why nothing. To any
such proof would cost him something and nothing
would he get by it: saving not employ the pleasure of hearing
and seeing himself laughed at by learned Gentlemen.
3.
To Reconcilement both
parties are accessory if
one party refuses the
other cannot make
him be reconciled
Now then as to the disp of the two parties. Either
they are both of them disposed to reconcilement or they are not
if they are, nothing is then to hinder them: they may
[ ] than they are
the for this judge
it with the least possible trouble and without any expence
Now suppose one of them withes for reconcilement, the other not
what is the case either of them the better for the Judge. No
could be his for having any thing to do with the
matter for any purpose better or other than the making more sense
if setting than together by the case. But suppose it was really
to being abuse or reconciliation what would be whose wish it were
to be reconciled? what would the parties in either of
them be the better for wish. To a reconcilement, as to
some other things, two parties are necessary: one of them the stuborn one will
not be reconciled: and as to the other his matter the
yet the Judge can make him be so.
|
Identifier: | JB/004/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-07-29 |
1-3 |
||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
194 |
review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1829 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
2115 |
|||
