★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<note>5. Conciliating<lb/> | <note>5. Conciliating<lb/> | ||
Reinquiries | Reinquiries?</note> | ||
<note>1<lb/> | <note>1<lb/> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Court of Reconciliation</note> | Court of Reconciliation</note> | ||
<p>§. 96. Reconcilement. <gap/> If and when a party has<lb/> | <p>§. 96. Reconcilement. <del><gap/></del> If and when a party has<lb/> | ||
acited as per §. 95, "he shall as his own election appears and<lb/> | |||
"not before the said Judge." Well, and suppose he does not appear<lb/> | "not before the said Judge." Well, and suppose he does not appear<lb/> | ||
nor takes any | nor takes any notice of it what then? why then "he<lb/> | ||
"shall within one week of being so cited, serve the party so citing<lb/> | "shall within one week of being so cited, serve the party so citing<lb/> | ||
<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <gap/><gap/><lb/> | <del>"<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <add><gap/><gap/></add></del><lb/> | ||
"with a notice, in which notice he shall | <add>"with a notice, in which notice he shall state "whether he intends to appear<lb/> | ||
"not." Well and suppose he does not perform such serving.<lb/> | "not.<del>"</del> Well and suppose he does not perform such serving.</add><lb/> | ||
Service till after the | Service till after the event is at <unclear>and so</unclear> does not <gap/> it all</p> | ||
<p>What then? Why then "such Notice may be given to with the proof of citation<lb/> | <p>What then? Why then "such Notice <del>may be given to</del> <add>with the</add> proof of citation<lb/> | ||
"<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> in evidence against the party | "<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> in evidence against the party cited in any such<lb/> | ||
"who have or in Equity which may be brought against the party<lb/> | "<unclear>who have or in</unclear> Equity which may be brought against the party<lb/> | ||
"citing for the purpose of proving that the party cited refused<lb/> | "citing for the purpose of proving that the party cited refused<lb/> | ||
"to appear before the Judge in Ordinary or a Court of Reconcilement."</p> | "to appear before the Judge in Ordinary or a Court of Reconcilement."</p> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
at by lawyers</note> | at by lawyers</note> | ||
<p>Well, and what of | <p>Well, and what of this? why nothing. To <del><gap/></del> <gap/> any<lb/> | ||
such proof would cost him <gap/> something and nothing<lb/> | such proof would cost him <del><gap/></del> something and nothing<lb/> | ||
would he get by it: saving not <gap/> employ the pleasure of hearing<lb/> | would he get by it: saving not <gap/> employ the pleasure of hearing<lb/> | ||
and seeing himself laughed at by learned Gentlemen.</p> | and seeing himself laughed at by learned Gentlemen.</p> | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
him be reconciled</note> | him be reconciled</note> | ||
<p>Now then as to the | <p>Now then as to the <unclear>dispute</unclear> of the two parties. Either<lb/> | ||
they are both of them disposed to reconcilement or they are not<lb/> | they are both of them disposed to reconcilement or they are not<lb/> | ||
if they are, nothing is then to hinder them: <gap/> <gap/> they may<lb/> | if they are, nothing is then to hinder them: <del><gap/></del> <gap/> they may<lb/> | ||
<note>[ ] <gap/> than they are <gap/><lb/> | <note><hi rend="superscript">[ ]</hi> <gap/> than they are <gap/><lb/> | ||
the <gap/> for this judge</note><lb/> | the <gap/> for this judge</note><lb/> | ||
make it with the least possible trouble and without any <sic>expence</sic><lb/> | |||
Now suppose one of them withes for reconcilement, the other not<lb/> | Now suppose one of them withes for reconcilement, the other not<lb/> | ||
what is the case <gap/> <gap/> either of them the better for the Judge. No<lb/> | what is the case <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> either of them the <unclear>better</unclear> for the Judge. No<lb/> | ||
<gap/> could be his for having any thing to do with the<lb/> | <gap/> could be his for having any thing to do with the<lb/> | ||
matter for any purpose better or other than the making more sense<lb/> | <unclear>matter</unclear> for any purpose <unclear>better</unclear> or other than the making more <unclear>sense</unclear><lb/> | ||
if setting than together by the | if setting than together by the ears. But suppose it was <add>really</add> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | ||
to being abuse or reconciliation what would be whose wish it | to <unclear>being abuse or</unclear> reconciliation what would be whose wish it was<lb/> | ||
to <gap/> be reconciled? what would the parties | to <del><gap/></del> be reconciled? what would the parties or either of<lb/> | ||
them be the better for <gap/> wish. To a reconcilement, as to<lb/> | them be the better for <del><gap/></del> wish. To a reconcilement, as to<lb/> | ||
some other things, two parties are necessary: one of them the stuborn one will<lb/> | some other things, two parties are necessary: one of them <add>the <sic>stuborn</sic> one</add> will<lb/> | ||
not be reconciled: and as to the other <gap/> <gap/> his matter the<lb/> | not be reconciled: and <del>as to the other <gap/> <gap/></del> his matter the<lb/> | ||
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> yet the Judge can make him be so.</p> | <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> yet the Judge can make him be so.</p> | ||
1830. July 29 M
Review.
5. Conciliating
Reinquiries?
1
Proof by one party of
the refusal of the other
party to appear in a
Court of Reconciliation
§. 96. Reconcilement. If and when a party has
acited as per §. 95, "he shall as his own election appears and
"not before the said Judge." Well, and suppose he does not appear
nor takes any notice of it what then? why then "he
"shall within one week of being so cited, serve the party so citing
"
"with a notice, in which notice he shall state "whether he intends to appear
"not." Well and suppose he does not perform such serving.
Service till after the event is at and so does not it all
What then? Why then "such Notice may be given to with the proof of citation
" in evidence against the party cited in any such
"who have or in Equity which may be brought against the party
"citing for the purpose of proving that the party cited refused
"to appear before the Judge in Ordinary or a Court of Reconcilement."
2
Nothing gained but
hearing himself laughed
at by lawyers
Well, and what of this? why nothing. To any
such proof would cost him something and nothing
would he get by it: saving not employ the pleasure of hearing
and seeing himself laughed at by learned Gentlemen.
3.
To Reconcilement both
parties are accessory if
one party refuses the
other cannot make
him be reconciled
Now then as to the dispute of the two parties. Either
they are both of them disposed to reconcilement or they are not
if they are, nothing is then to hinder them: they may
[ ] than they are
the for this judge
make it with the least possible trouble and without any expence
Now suppose one of them withes for reconcilement, the other not
what is the case either of them the better for the Judge. No
could be his for having any thing to do with the
matter for any purpose better or other than the making more sense
if setting than together by the ears. But suppose it was really
to being abuse or reconciliation what would be whose wish it was
to be reconciled? what would the parties or either of
them be the better for wish. To a reconcilement, as to
some other things, two parties are necessary: one of them the stuborn one will
not be reconciled: and as to the other his matter the
yet the Judge can make him be so.
|
Identifier: | JB/004/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1830-07-29 |
1-3 |
||
|
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
|
194 |
review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1829 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
2115 |
|||
