JB/004/194/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/004/194/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/004/194/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


<p>&sect;. 96. Reconcilement. <del><gap/></del> If and when a party has<lb/>
<p>&sect;. 96. Reconcilement. <del><gap/></del> If and when a party has<lb/>
acited as per &sect;. 95, "he shall as his own election appears and<lb/>
cited as per &sect;. 95, "he shall as his own election appears and<lb/>
"not before the said Judge." Well, and suppose he does not appear<lb/>
"not before the said Judge." Well, and suppose he does not appear<lb/>
nor takes any notice of it what then? why then "he<lb/>
nor takes any notice of it what then? why then "he<lb/>
Line 22: Line 22:
<del>"<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <add><gap/><gap/></add></del><lb/>
<del>"<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <add><gap/><gap/></add></del><lb/>
<add>"with a notice, in which notice he shall state "whether he intends to appear<lb/>
<add>"with a notice, in which notice he shall state "whether he intends to appear<lb/>
"not.<del>"</del> Well and suppose he does not perform such serving.</add><lb/>
or not.<del>"</del> Well and suppose he does not perform such serving.</add><lb/>
Service till after the event is at <unclear>and so</unclear> does not <gap/> it all</p>
Service till after the event is at <unclear>and so</unclear> does not <gap/> it all</p>


Line 38: Line 38:
<p>Well, and what of this? why nothing. To <del><gap/></del> <gap/> any<lb/>
<p>Well, and what of this? why nothing. To <del><gap/></del> <gap/> any<lb/>
such proof would cost him <del><gap/></del> something and nothing<lb/>
such proof would cost him <del><gap/></del> something and nothing<lb/>
would he get by it: saving not <gap/> employ the pleasure of hearing<lb/>
would he get by it: saving and excepting the pleasure of hearing<lb/>
and seeing himself laughed at by learned Gentlemen.</p>
and seeing himself laughed at by learned Gentlemen.</p>


Line 54: Line 54:
the <gap/> for this judge</note><lb/>
the <gap/> for this judge</note><lb/>
make it with the least possible trouble and without any <sic>expence</sic><lb/>
make it with the least possible trouble and without any <sic>expence</sic><lb/>
Now suppose one of them withes for reconcilement, the other not<lb/>
Now suppose one of them wishes for reconcilement, the other not<lb/>
what is the case <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> either of them the <unclear>better</unclear> for the Judge. No<lb/>
what is the case <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> either of them the <unclear>better</unclear> for the Judge. No<lb/>
<gap/> could be his for having any thing to do with the<lb/>
<gap/> could be his for having any thing to do with the<lb/>
<unclear>matter</unclear> for any purpose <unclear>better</unclear> or other than the making more <unclear>sense</unclear><lb/>
<unclear>matter</unclear> for any purpose <unclear>better</unclear> or other than the making more <unclear>sense</unclear><lb/>
if setting than together by the ears. But suppose it was <add>really</add> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
if setting them together by the ears. But suppose it was <add>really</add> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
to <unclear>being abuse or</unclear> reconciliation what would be whose wish it was<lb/>
to <unclear>being abuse or</unclear> reconciliation what would be whose wish it was<lb/>
to <del><gap/></del> be reconciled? what would the parties or either of<lb/>
to <del><gap/></del> be reconciled? what would the parties or either of<lb/>
Line 69: Line 69:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 08:19, 10 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1830. July 29 M
Review.

5. Conciliating
Reinquiries?

1
Proof by one party of
the refusal of the other
party to appear in a
Court of Reconciliation

§. 96. Reconcilement. If and when a party has
cited as per §. 95, "he shall as his own election appears and
"not before the said Judge." Well, and suppose he does not appear
nor takes any notice of it what then? why then "he
"shall within one week of being so cited, serve the party so citing
"
"with a notice, in which notice he shall state "whether he intends to appear
or not." Well and suppose he does not perform such serving.

Service till after the event is at and so does not it all

What then? Why then "such Notice may be given to with the proof of citation
" in evidence against the party cited in any such
"who have or in Equity which may be brought against the party
"citing for the purpose of proving that the party cited refused
"to appear before the Judge in Ordinary or a Court of Reconcilement."

2
Nothing gained but
hearing himself laughed
at by lawyers

Well, and what of this? why nothing. To any
such proof would cost him something and nothing
would he get by it: saving and excepting the pleasure of hearing
and seeing himself laughed at by learned Gentlemen.

3.
To Reconcilement both
parties are accessory if
one party refuses the
other cannot make
him be reconciled

Now then as to the dispute of the two parties. Either
they are both of them disposed to reconcilement or they are not
if they are, nothing is then to hinder them: they may
[ ] than they are
the for this judge

make it with the least possible trouble and without any expence
Now suppose one of them wishes for reconcilement, the other not
what is the case either of them the better for the Judge. No
could be his for having any thing to do with the
matter for any purpose better or other than the making more sense
if setting them together by the ears. But suppose it was really
to being abuse or reconciliation what would be whose wish it was
to be reconciled? what would the parties or either of
them be the better for wish. To a reconcilement, as to
some other things, two parties are necessary: one of them the stuborn one will
not be reconciled: and as to the other his matter the
yet the Judge can make him be so.




Identifier: | JB/004/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-07-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

194

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1829

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

2115

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in