JB/055/200/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/200/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 41: Line 41:
falshood, as per Ch. ( ) &sect;. ( )</p>
falshood, as per Ch. ( ) &sect;. ( )</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:55, 22 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. March April 1, 2
Procedure Code

Enactive

Art. or 3 IV. Cases exhibiting the maximum of advantageousness
on the part of the part of the mutual presence or oral, and mutual distance
or epistolary modes, in the originative and a post-originative
judicatory are as follows – ☞ Back to the margin

Informative

Only for general guidance, not for decrees
these observations, as to what will most commonly have
place, of any case: only for information and general
guidance: for, if in the individual case in which it is
employed the mode employed is not the most
apt, its being so in most or even all other individual
cases will not be a justification for employing
it in this.

Art. or 3. I. Case I. Mode oral Distance of the Defendants abode from the Judgment seat an inconvenience. Judicatory
the originative Judicatory. The Distance of the Defendants
abode not greater than will admitt of his walking to
the Judgment seat time enough for his attendance, and returning
before he goes to rest. Complexity of the matter of his defence
a minimum or a maximum – it
makes no difference. Rule I. In this case, mode To the oral mode will the
preference will in general be due.

Art. or 4. Case II. Mode epistolary Distance of Deft
Judicatory, as before the originative
judicatory. Distance of Defendants abode a maximum
be it that a which is situate to wit within the
territory of that Judicatory the Judgment seat of which is the most distant
from that of the originative judicatory. Complexity of
the case a maximum minimum. Rule II. In this
case to the epistolary mode will in general the preference
be due – understand always where as per
Ch. §. backed by eventual re-examination, to wit performed in
by subsequential oral examination
at discretion, with responsibility,
compensational non
punitional on the spot in case of
falshood, as per Ch. ( ) §. ( )


Identifier: | JB/055/200/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-04-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

11 or 3 - 12 or 4

Box

055

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

200

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Enactive

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C2 / E6

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17921

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in